doug elick Posted September 2, 2005 Share Posted September 2, 2005 I recently agreed to shoot a small local concert for a person I know, mainly for the experience, using 135 BW400CN rated at 800. Though the negatives can be thin, I've had good luck with this film/lab combination so far. This time, when I received my photos back, to my horror, all the heads were cut off; whoever ran the machine got the registration wrong and printed across frames. To make matters worse, they cut the film the same way, so about 1/4 of all the frames are cut in half. I'm not on a deadline, but I want to get the prints done ASAP, so I plan on printing the worthy/salvagable frames myself. However, I've heard this film (with the orange mask) can be difficult to work with in a traditional darkroom. Given the workflow I've been following lately is 6x6 Tri-X pushed or pulled, printed on Ilford RC single grade paper and developed in Kodak chems what are your suggestions? I've been thinking about going Multi-Contrast, would doing so now give me more flexibility over single grade when dealing with this orange masked film? I'm out of chems and paper over grade 3, so if anyone has suggestions, I might try products other than my standards. Suggestions are appreciated, Doug Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neal_wydra1 Posted September 2, 2005 Share Posted September 2, 2005 Dear Doug, BW400CN is really not meant to be printed using traditional paper. Panalure is one option if you have or can get some. Printing on Portra B&W RA-4 paper would be the easiest using room temperature chemicals. After that, RA-4 color paper. All things considered, it would seem that the easiest way to save the cut frames would be scanning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jshaw.photo Posted September 2, 2005 Share Posted September 2, 2005 I've actually done this before but never with a pushed negative. I used a variable contrast Kodak fiber paper and put an Ilford 4 or 5 contrast filter into my beseler 23CII enlarger. Kodak chems. It wasn't much trouble actually. Good Luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mb81 Posted September 3, 2005 Share Posted September 3, 2005 When I shoot BW400CN I just print on a higher contrast filter. Usually with this film, using a #3 or #3 1/2 would equal about a #2 normally. I wouldnt bother too much with the color paper, it can be a pain. Or, like stated above, use photoshop and print digitally, this would make the most sense due to the fact that frames are cut in half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now