art_arkin Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 This is probably a much covered question but as I use a (programable) Jobo ATL 1500 it may differ enough to justify. So I shot a 5 pack of the old style 120 tri-x last weekend and therefore seek your opinions on the best dev time. This emulsion is definitely different from the current generation that gives a slightly magenta coloured neg. I once did a roll of old and new tri-x in the same dev tank (35mm) and found the old version had come out significantly over deved. I am finding that provided the film is given a 5 min prewet, one can generaly go with the recommended dev time for hand tank inversion processing though this does aparently vary with the dev / film combo. If it helps I will also provide you some info on the actual photography. The pictures are of a model sitting by a window covered with white curtains. The afternoon light coupled the strong diffusion gave a beautiful soft light. A big reflector behind the model yielded about 3 stops difference between light and shadow. easy for tri-x to handle (i think) The camera (a Hasselblad) was tripod mounted with exposures of 1/30th at 4 - 5.6 Anyone with experience on this combo, please share your times and thoughts. Given the subject and style described above, would you recommend stock or 1:1 ? Many thanks in advance, Arthur. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnmarkpainter Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 I haven't used D76 for a while, but I think that developing in Stock is just a waste of chemical. I always did 1+1 or 1+2 jmp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronald_moravec1 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 You will get finer grain and a very slight loss in sharpness used undiluted. You won`t notice the sharpness loss up to 10x or so. The finer grain shows up much sooner. If that is a waste of chemistry, so be it. I hate grain. Some don`t care. If you want really sharp with very sharp pronounced grain, dilute 1:3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul_sauer Posted April 20, 2005 Share Posted April 20, 2005 I always use stock D-76 on Tri-X when they are photos of people -- it gives a soft, etherial look without too much grain. If your roll has more angular stuff, like buildings, architecture, etc, you might try the 1+!. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now