Brian_Edwards Posted February 15, 2005 Share Posted February 15, 2005 Is is me, or is HP5 highly sensitive to overdevelopment? It seems as though developing for more time than my normal development time (120 film, ISO 320, 8 minutes, D76 1:1, 20/68, Jobo) causes my negatives to become far more grainy that they do normally. While I would imagine that this would likely happen with most, if not all, black and white films to some degree, is there anyone out there with a similar experience? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
h._p. Posted February 15, 2005 Share Posted February 15, 2005 HP5 has always been sensitive to overexposure, in my experience, as was HP4 before it. Oddly enough, I find that HP5 developed in Paterson's Acutol, really an acutance developer for slow/medium films, has a tighter grain structure than when developed in D76/ID11. I rate the film at it's full 400 ISO and develop for the recommended 10 minutes at 20C. It works for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_waller Posted February 15, 2005 Share Posted February 15, 2005 I've never found it particularly sensitive to over-development. Are you developing by hand or is it a machine processor? Like most 'old technology' films it can take a fair amount of over-development although perhaps not as tolerant as Tri-X. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lex_jenkins Posted February 15, 2005 Share Posted February 15, 2005 I found that HP5+ negatives were grainier than usual when developed in Microphen (even when not pushed hard). But I never noticed any problems in ID-11 at or near the nominal speed with either 35mm or 120. However I've used only the standard intermittent agitation technique in stainless or plastic tank/reel systems with HP5+ and ID-11 (or any other developer I can think of offhand). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lowell_huff1 Posted February 15, 2005 Share Posted February 15, 2005 The temperature and adgitation in a jobo are far greater than by manual hand tank so the processing times are much less. With Clayton chemistry in a jobo that film would process for 5? minutes with a dilution of 1+14. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lowell_huff1 Posted February 15, 2005 Share Posted February 15, 2005 The temperature and adgitation in a jobo are far greater than by manual hand tank so the processing times are much less. With Clayton chemistry in a jobo that film would process for 5? minutes with a dilution of 1+14. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian_Edwards Posted February 16, 2005 Author Share Posted February 16, 2005 At my settings and development time (ISO 320, 8 minutes at 20/68, D76 1:1) I get very little gain. The other day, I shot on a fairly drab day and increased my development time to 8:30 (all else equal) and noticed a significant increase in grain and contrast. I was hoping for a small increase in contrast, but was surprized at how much the grain had increased. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now