jim_landecker Posted May 5, 2004 Share Posted May 5, 2004 Hi, I recently tried self-mixed Pyrocat for the first time, developing 4x5" film using a CPE-2 and 2521 drum with 2509n reel. The films I tried were Classic 200, Delta 100 and HP5+. I'm pretty happy with the results and all the negatives, which were of a contrasty scene, print easily and are very sharp. But....all of the Classic 200 negatives, and to a lesser degree the Ilford films (although I haven't processed enough for this to be absolutely conclusive), show density streaks near the edges of the film that sit in the grooves of the reel. Putting the film back into the reel I can see that indeed where streaks are worst, the film is sitting close to the concentric bar of the reel. This effect is probably why Jobo recommends the high speed setting for film development (which I normally use and have had even development), but is unfortunately contrary to Sandy King's recommendation of low speed to avoid oxidation and general stain. So far I am considering trying the following solutions:<p> a. add some sodium sulfite as suggested by Sandy King, and try the high speed rotation.<p> b. only use the Ilford films, which seem less prone to the problem.<p> c. try developing on a CPA which can be set for "in-between" speeds and see if a slightly higher speed will get rid of the streaks without causing oxidation and stain problems.<p> d. leave enough space around the edges for cropping.<p> e. don't use Pyrocat with sheet film.<p> <p> I'll try option (a) first, as I would like to keep using the Pyrocat and the Classic 200, which I like a lot. Have any others with the same setup seen and found a way to minimize this problem?<P> <p> Thanks for any insights,<P> <P> Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arne_strasser Posted May 5, 2004 Share Posted May 5, 2004 My setup wasn't quite like yours (120 film) but I had streaks on the sides of the first negative processed in Pyrocat-HD with jobo-drums, too. I had made the A-solution without EDTA and had diluted it in tap-water - Our water contains lots of calcium. I then added EDTA to the A-solution and only used destilled water for both pre-wash and diluting the developer. I have never seen any streaks, traces of uneven development or such on my negatives since then. It's just something you might try- unless someone has a better answer. Arne Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_landecker Posted May 5, 2004 Author Share Posted May 5, 2004 Arne,<P> Which formula were you using, as the one on unblinkingeye.com has no EDTA?<P> BTW, I was also using distilled water and a presoak, except the first set of negatives where I forgot, but the lack of presoak didn't affect the streaking at all.<P> Thanks,<P> Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_witkop Posted May 5, 2004 Share Posted May 5, 2004 I use a cpe-2 with the same drums with pyrocat-hd from photographers formulary, with fp4+. So far haven't found any problems with streaking, or density build up near the edges. My cpe-2 only has one speed though 75 rpm, well two if you count 0 rpm. In Sandy King's article on unblinkingeye.com, he gives two solutions for using pyrocat at high rotation speeds, adding sodium silfite, or simply using more solution. I do the latter, useing 400ml, and haven't had any problems with streaking or high levels of general fog. Peter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
discpad Posted May 5, 2004 Share Posted May 5, 2004 The problem is the 2509 film holder in a 25xx drum: Use a CPP with a 3010 or 3005 drum and your problems will vanish... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_landecker Posted May 5, 2004 Author Share Posted May 5, 2004 Peter, Thanks, that's good to hear - I'll try the additional 30% of solution A at high speed. Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rowland_mowrey Posted May 5, 2004 Share Posted May 5, 2004 See the article in this months Photo Technique about Pyrogallol. Page 11. Nuff said. Ron Mowrey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henry_a Posted May 5, 2004 Share Posted May 5, 2004 The reels you are using will give increased edge density with any film or process. Jobo tells about this in the instructions I think. It just does not show up in most scenes. I've done C41 4X5 this way and could vaguely see it on product shots on white background but it was not a problem for me as I was leaving plenty of room around the edges. I have run D100, FP4 and HP5 in Xtol in these reels and don't see it at all. But I think if I shot a blank wall I might. How much working solution are you using? I'd suggest you use as much as the CPE2 will turn. I use a Unicolor motor base that lets me use as much developer as I want. Alternately, don't use rotary but use the Jobo drum for manual agitation. If you have the larger drum that holds 2 reels you can put in 1.5 liters of developer and only one film reel and then turn it over gently every minute or two to agitate. I've been agitating every other minute with HP5 for 16 minutes and I'm pleased with the results - three minute pre-soak, Pyrocat HD 1:1:100, 70 degrees, HP5 at 320, water stop then fix. The one roll drum is worthless for this as it is actually shorter than the reel and by the time you cover the film the tank is too full. My reasons for this minimal agitation scheme are: slightly higher film speed, some compensation (seems to slow development in the highlights a bit but I have no proof), ease of use compared to trays, ease of washing, no handling of film until its done and ready to hang. I bet our Classic 200 will like this treatment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now