Nature
11,114 topics in this forum
-
- 3 replies
- 371 views
-
- 8 replies
- 446 views
-
- 4 replies
- 485 views
-
- 4 replies
- 456 views
-
- 9 replies
- 650 views
-
- 5 replies
- 416 views
-
- 8 replies
- 595 views
-
- 10 replies
- 558 views
-
- 7 replies
- 652 views
-
- 7 replies
- 425 views
-
- 9 replies
- 5.4k views
-
- 7 replies
- 561 views
-
- 7 replies
- 585 views
-
- 8 replies
- 695 views
-
- 8 replies
- 573 views
-
- 3 replies
- 581 views
-
- 6 replies
- 772 views
-
- 5 replies
- 585 views
-
- 4 replies
- 762 views
-
- 1 reply
- 625 views
-
- 3 replies
- 591 views
-
- 7 replies
- 940 views
-
- 5 replies
- 654 views
-
- 1 reply
- 611 views
-
- 6 replies
- 816 views
(800x800).thumb.jpg.c94833d6ea93605f47351873a94fc0cc.jpg)
-
Who's Online 8 Members, 0 Anonymous, 420 Guests (See full list)
-
Recent Gallery Images
-
Recent Forum Wide Posts
-
-
As I looked into the developing the negatives my self, I quick realized that I would still need to scan in the negatives to be able to see how the photograph turned out. Is there a way to get an idea for what the photographs look like without having a full scanning setup? I know I'll eventually get into it, but the startup cost is too high for me at the moment... thanks! -
-
By gary green · Posted
Hi Chuck, I had a similar problem with my Argoflex Forty camera that I discussed here (LINK) and also solved it it a similar manner. -
By Mark Keefer · Posted
Perhaps soaking the shell in paint remover? Are you still planning to use the camera or is it going to be an ornamental conversation piece. Just taking the shell and paint with a non-toxic clear coat and making an aquarium ornament with bubble coming out might be cool. 🙂
-
.jpg.18693fe9a919872883c71904a2789e1f.jpg)
