bgelfand

Just what I wanted, Shun. Thank you very much.

I do not know why the link to the video review of the 28-75 G2 (for the Sony mount) shows up as a black line in my post, but it you click on the "black line, the review on YouTube will play. Shun, if you can fix it, will you, please. I can no longer edit my post.

Here is a review of the G2 lens for the Sony mount. It would appear that the G2 is a distinct improvement over the older model which Nikon is selling under its name. https://youtu.be/26pjqVssOUQ

It is Sunday March 17th (also known as St. Patrick's Day). Only one image has anyone wearing green - one small figure in Jon Eckman's image. Where are the Shamrocks and Leprechauns? 😉

Vampire Cat? No, sleepy cat; he is yawning. Nikon D750 1/200 sec, f/5, ISO 800 (Auto) Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 A032N @ 62mm SB-800 flash

Didn't Alan Shepard play golf on the Apollo 14 mission? Or at least hit a couple of golf balls around while on the moon. Of course 20 fps might be a little overkill to capture the event.

Nikon D750 1/250 sec, f/7.1, ISO 220 (Auto) Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 A032N @ 48mm Range: 1.88 meters

I hope you were using a long lens. Kitty looks hungry and interested.

I have not had any problems seeing the images in Dieter's posts. It could be simply timing - when you looked, the site was down.

Agreed, if the Original Poster wanted remaining space. But the Original Poster's question was: He specifically asked for exposures taken not exposures remaining. I believe he was trying to estimate the time it would take him to post process the images he was taking and adjust his shooting appropriately to give him time post process after the shoot. Although I am not specifically answering the question either since my solution requires pressing the REVIEW button and not just glancing at the control panel. I also assume that for two cards, both have been formatted at the same time. Since I always format the cards in the camera, it takes only a few seconds more to format the second card after the first. Of course the D750 does not have the secure format feature that I understand the Z cameras have which very probably takes longer to execute. My answer also does not take video into consideration. On the D750, a video is counted as one image. If I have 4 still images on the card, then take a video, and finally another still image, the last still image would have a 6/6 count; the video would be 5/6. Of course videos will take longer to post process than a still image, and my method does not differentiate.

Not on my D750. I always format my cards in the camera after I upload the images to my computer and back them up. Last night I tested before I posted. I took two shots. They were labeled 2/2 and 1/2; the number starts at 1. I know I have taken many more than 2 images since I have owned the camera. 😉 No, the number cannot start at zero. Zero would mean there are no images on the card which gives a message that the folder is empty when you try to review the images. If you are using the cards in Backup mode (which is the way I use my cards), the number of images on each card would be the same; the numbers would be the same. If you are using the cards in Overflow, I suspect the numbers would reflect the total number of images taken on the two cards, although I have never tried this. If you are using the cards as RAW in slot 1 and JPEG in slot 2, I suspect the number k would reflect the number of RAW images. If you fill the RAW card and inset a new card in slot 1 and retain the old card for JPEG in slot two. I suspect the numbers would reflect only the RAW image count, but have never tried it.

I cannot write about the Z cameras, but on my D750 when I review the images on the rear LCD, the number of the image is shown in the upper right hand corner as n/k, where n is the number of the image I am looking at and k is the number images on the card.

Mike, thank you very much for the information.

Very nice shot, Mike. Who was flying the hawk? were they hunting it or was it at a bird park/zoo?