Paul Lewis1664881697 Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 I simply don't understand this. Maybe someone can come up with a good reason. I was walking through a park today and saw a wedding party being photographed. The photographer was using a massive lens, which was certainly bigger than my Nikkor 80-200mm f2.8, and I know how heavy that is on a big body. Not only that, but he was standing between 20-30 feet away from the group, yelling instructions to the person holding the flash unit and the photo subjects. This isn't the first time I've seen a ridiculous scene like this. Why not shoot with a great prime lens such as the Canon 85mm or the Nikkor 85mm / f1.4 if blurring the backround is the goal? Why do fashion and wedding photographers shoot like this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Two23 Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 Single focal lenses are of course useful, but not flexible. A fast pro zoom is a time saver. They are quick to use and convenient. Some also have VR which is useful. Kent in SD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_j2 Posted May 5, 2008 Share Posted May 5, 2008 "standing between 20-30 feet away from the group" with a "massive lens" does not sound right. How many people in the group and how many rows in that group? One would use a 135mm up to 30 feet away to photograph one person. But for a group? Must be a tight group head shot. If that was the case, then I can't see a problem with that. What works, works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike dixon Posted May 5, 2008 Share Posted May 5, 2008 Why ask a question about lens choices for portraits in the Lighting forum? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_levine Posted May 5, 2008 Share Posted May 5, 2008 I'm not sure how you decided this was a "ridiculous scene"? Wedding photographers (like most photographers) use zooms so that they don't have to carry a bag of lenses, and to avoid switching lenses continually. The only person that could have answered your question would have been the "shooter" in the park. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonathan_brown1 Posted May 5, 2008 Share Posted May 5, 2008 The benefit of this set up is that the longer lens compresses the image more and brings the background closer to the subject to give the image a different look. it is not ridiculous it is just a different way of doing things. If I have room I like to get back for some shots as well. Not something I do all the time but if the situation is right it gives a different look to the image if the background is cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tony_clark Posted May 5, 2008 Share Posted May 5, 2008 It gives a different perspective to the image. What did the subject look like? The background can be manipulated and elements eliminated if needed by zooming to the longer end of the zoom. Perhaps that was the longest, fastest lens that he owned. Not everyone can afford or even want a 85/1.4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
umesh_bhatt1 Posted May 5, 2008 Share Posted May 5, 2008 Compression. Long Telephoto lenses makes the bride look thinner (preferred from a bride's perspective) - as compared to 85mm lens; which is most suitable for head shots and children closeups. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ellis_vener_photography Posted May 5, 2008 Share Posted May 5, 2008 To expand on what Tony and Umesh wrote; it is optical physics at work. Standing further back reducies the realtive distance between the tip of the nose and the ears (in a head on portrait) which makes for a more flattering photo. If you keep the size of the subject in the frame the same whether you get close with an 85mm lens or step back with a 300mm lens, the area of the background covered seen in the composition is narrower with the longer lens. Since you have an 80-200mm set up a static 3 D subject and try it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Lewis1664881697 Posted May 5, 2008 Author Share Posted May 5, 2008 Sorry for posting here.. I should have put this in the wedding forum. I thought it was a ridiculous scene because the photographer was so far from the subjects and the light that it would be very difficult to manipulate either of them. Interesting point about the distance between the nose and ears... thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aimpic Posted May 5, 2008 Share Posted May 5, 2008 Sometimes the distance between both ears is more important. Oh, and if you use a long one, put your clients on Pocket Wizard. Cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerrymat Posted May 5, 2008 Share Posted May 5, 2008 I think a simple experiment demonstrates the principle involved here. Stand a few feet from a mirror and extend your arm and hand. Carefully compare the apparent size of the reflected hand and your face. The hand will appear much larger than normal compared to the face. Now stand 10-12 feet from the mirror and do it again- your hand appears in correct proportion to your face. Now stand three layers of people on a bleacher. Using your zoom lens at the shortest focal length, compose and take a picture. Then move further away and use the zoom lens to get the same composition. Do this over and over until you are as far away as you can stand and still frame the group. Make prints of each and compare. When you are close the heads in the third row look smaller than the heads in the front row. When you are further away the heads become become the same size, and can look like they are in the same plane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave_holland Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 1. Better Bokeh. 2. Better isolation of the subject. Avoids confusing and distracting backgrounds, in situations where the "sideground" is too busy. With a narrow angle of view, only the background exactly behind the subject appears in the photo. 3. Occasionally helps to pull a distant object into closer relationship with the subject. For example, if you have a famous mountain background, you may want to use it as a backdrop for a portrait. The long lens pulls distant objects closer, compressing distance. 4. It avoids the tendency for wide lenses to overemphasize foreground, like the subject's nose, or the front row of participants. Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy m Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 Ridiculous, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now