s._usary Posted February 14, 2011 Share Posted February 14, 2011 <p>I haven't considered this for a while, but would like to hear from users of various E-6 emulsions as to which slide film scans best or perhaps the two or three that are the best choices for scanning purposes. Thanks in advance for any opinions/info.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doug andrews Posted February 14, 2011 Share Posted February 14, 2011 <p>I always found Fuji Astia to scan very well.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larrydressler Posted February 14, 2011 Share Posted February 14, 2011 <p>I have only had a few problems and that was Kodachrome but that is a moot point and Velvia 50. Every thing else is a piece of cake.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
s._usary Posted February 14, 2011 Author Share Posted February 14, 2011 <p>Agreed re Kodachrome. I have thousands of old ones but with little fading or degradation. But they required heavy application of PS to make them presentable as digital images.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicaglow Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 <p>I don't really find problems scanning film. I use a lot of Ektachrome and Provia films, but have never had problems with Astia, Velvia, Sensia, Kodachrome type films. I use CanonoScan dedicated scanners for 35mm and Epson for MF and LF.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lex_harris Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 <p>In my experience the end result is more dependent on scanner quality and scanning technique than film type. I have no problem scanning Kodachrome and disagree about the need for heavy use of PS. I have many thousands of Kodachromes and routinely find that the shadow detail that can be extracted from Kodachrome far surpasses that from E6 films such as Ektachrome and Provia. I use an Imacon 646. I also have a Nikon 5000ED which I find is incapable of extracting full quality from any of these slide films. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randrew1 Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 <p>I agree with Lex. With the right scanner and technique, all films are equally scanable. When my Minolta was working, I could handle anything, even faded Agfachromes or color negs from the 50's. I do have trouble with the cyan dye in Kodachrome with my Coolscan III. It can't handle the cyan maximum density.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_henderson Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 <blockquote> <p>In my experience the end result is more dependent on scanner quality and scanning technique than film type.</p> </blockquote> <p>I agree. I also prefer Imacon scans from my slides- Velvia 30/100 and Provia 100 to those from Coolscans, though the latter will also make good prints. The Imacon, albeit nominally of lower resolution, seems to dig out more shadow detail, and thats an important quality for slide film.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
photo5 Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 <p>Kodak E100GX scans well in my experience. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larrydressler Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 <p>I would rather scan "ANY" slide film over color negative film. :)</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Luttmann Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 <p>Astia is my favorite. Large latitude (for a chrome) and the finest grain going.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randall_pukalo Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 <p>As Larry said, ANY slide film scans better than negative films. Only Velvia and Kodachrome present challenges, mainly in dark shadow areas or underexposed frames.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
photo5 Posted February 17, 2011 Share Posted February 17, 2011 <p>Negative film scans better just because the contrast range is so compressed, but I hate the grain that comes with it. But if you want a wide range of contrast, negative film is the way to go. That being said I shoot color slide film. If I shoot negative film, it's black and white negative film.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
profhlynnjones Posted February 17, 2011 Share Posted February 17, 2011 <p>I've used most of the scanners. My favorites have always been Epson. I still have some 1950's Kodachromes, No Problem, scanned hundreds of color print films even including negative and positive duplicating films, No Problem, and when it comes to scanning b/w films many of the most expensive high res scanner virtually destroy b/w, not Epson!</p> <p>Lynn</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now