Jump to content

The Grammar Police are Upon You


ray .

Recommended Posts

You knew it would happen. The grammar police would come to get you one

day. Consider it done. I'll probably get royally flamed for this, but

I can't stand it any longer. ;) Little things annoy me. My own sister

has called me a curmudgeon, and she's probably right.

I keep seeing the same words misspelled(sp?) over and over. I see the

same

people doing it too. You know who you are... well, actually I guess

you don't. Those with another language other than English as their

native tongue are of course excused. I'm worried though they're

copying some people's bad examples.

 

Here are some of the poor words that get mangled:

 

too- This means also. It is not spelled "to". "To" is when you go

"to" some place.

 

lose- Gets spelled "loose". "Loose" is something that needs to be

tightened. "Lose" is as when you get your M7 stolen, or hopefully,

temporarily misplace it.

 

you're- contraction of "you are", often incorrectly spelled "your".

"You're beautiful, even if you insist on buying an MP." "Your" is to

show possession, as in "Your pictures suck."

 

There's one other that escapes me at the moment, but I'm sure I'll

think of it and you can bet your bippy I'll bring it to your attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

A while back there was an interesting article in a national newspaper that read along the lines of..."educators in North America feel that less emphasis should be placed on grammar (in school) and more emphasis on the intent of what the student is trying to say". A load of crap I say...I'm with you all the way on this one.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ray, How about using "there," "they're" and "their" interchangeably?

 

My personal #1 pet peeve is any argument long on attitude and short on writing skills. I've also seen many arguments on this forum spoiled by grammar and syntax so tortured, Amnesty International should be called. It's usually the native English speakers who are the worst offenders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reasons why the English language is so hard to learn:<br>

[a].- The bandage was wound around the wound.<br>

.- The farm was used to produce produce.<br>

[c].- The dump was so full that it had to refuse more refuse.<br>

[d].- We must polish the Polish furniture.<br>

[e].- He could lead if he would get the lead out.<br>

[f].- The soldier decided to desert his dessert in the desert.<br>

[g].- Since there is no time like the present, he thought it was<br>

time to present the present.

[h].- A bass was painted on the head of the bass drum.<br>

.- When shot at, the dove dove into the bushes.<br>

[j].- I did not object to the object.<br>

[k].- The insurance was invalid for the invalid.<br>

[l].- There was a row among the oarsmen about how to row.<br>

[m].- They were too close to the door to close it.<br>

[n].- The buck does funny things when the does are present.<br>

[o].- A seamstress and a sewer fell down into a sewer line.<br>

[p].- To help with planting, the farmer taught his sow to sow.<br>

[q].- The wind was too strong to wind the sail.<br>

[r].- After a number of injections my jaw got number.<br>

.- Upon seeing the tear in the painting I shed a tear.<br>

[t].- I had to subject the subject to a series of tests.<br>

.- How can I intimate this to my most intimate friend?<br>

</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While we're at it, how about those who show a casual attitude towards proper

punctuation?<P>

 

<I>It is not spelled "to". <BR>

Gets spelled "loose".</><P>

 

The period is always placed inside the ending quote.

www.citysnaps.net
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...