Jump to content

Just got a new a 50mm 1.4. How should I use it wide open?


Alex

Recommended Posts

<p>I know this might sound like a stupid question, but here it goes. The main reason I got this lens is to shoot my kids indoors with available light. I'm using a D40 if that makes a difference.<br>

Today I took a few pictures at f1.4 and I can see how nice is to have such a fast lens. In the other hand at f1.4 the DOF is so narrow (next to none existing) that unless I'm not understanding something it renders the lens unusable for what I intended it the most. I could not get any sharp image of the eyes, every one was out of focus. I tried auto focus as single and servo to see if this would help since my one year old is not much of a posing guy.I know I must be missing something since many people favor and use lenses this fast on various focal distances such as the 24mm, 28mm, 35mm, 85mm and so on.<br>

One other thing. I also looked at the 30mm f1.4 from Sigma and as much as the focal length is very appealing specially for a crop sensor I had second thoughts about getting a Sigma (not trying to be a snob) I did not do any research about the IQ of it and also I don't don't about compativility issued with future Canon bodies I might get. For the long haul would you buy this 30mm sigma or stick with a Canon? and I do realise they are not the same focal lenght.<br>

Thanks for your feed back<br>

Regards,<br>

Alex</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Alex,</p>

<p>I use this lens more than any other for making portraits of my doughter. She's only slightly over a year old and is very fast and unpredictable in her movements. After several initial tests I've discovered that at f/1.4 the camera must be nearly parallel to _both_ eyes for them to be in focus, else DOF is so small that focusing on one eye makes the other noticible less sharp. I've setled on f/2.0 as sufficient to blur the background and still keep eyes sharp. Focusing only on the eyes by choosing AF point that would require least movement for recomposing. Shooting mostly in single-shot AF.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Here is one raw image not corrected at all at 100% crop as an example. ISO 200, speed 125, flash 580EX diffused and this was not even at f1.4 it was at f1.8. If you noticed the focus was done mainy in the shirt/ear and also there is that magenta purplelish cast on his eye.<br>

I know I got the active AF point right on his eye. Not saying he did not move while I was shooting but how do you guys shooting weddings and things like it deal with this?<br />Thanks again<br />Alex</p><div>00TC8j-129117584.jpg.39f3fd95896369a35b61b602f3266ea6.jpg</div>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>To start with I would try to see if you can a sharp image of say your wife's eye in good light at f/1.4.<br>

To shoot pictures of your kids with this lens wide open is really very difficult especially if you are close enough to a small child to fill the frame. The kids must be very still when trying to shoot close shots like this. When I had my 10D (cropped sensor) I had to use this lens at f/4 to ensure eyes were sharp for close ups. As you already know the DoF is so very shallow wide open.<br>

My advice would be to try to use this lens in good light (it contradicts a little your reasons for buying the lens), make sure the subject is not moving, lock your exposure and keep dabbing the AF in AI servo until the moment is right then fire off a burst of shots.<br>

These were shot at f/4 on a 10D with 50mm f/1.4<br>

<a href="http://www.photo.net/photo/3759542">http://www.photo.net/photo/3759542</a><br>

<a href="http://www.photo.net/photo/3460375">http://www.photo.net/photo/3460375</a><br>

and this one (yes I know I keep posting it but it shows the shallow DoF) at f/1.4 on a 5D..</p><div>00TC9t-129131584.thumb.jpg.68e587fa748c00e7fd2426c4e8d80e1b.jpg</div>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>You need to determine whether there is a focus problem (back focus) or if the issue is user error. Assuming the lens is functioning correctly, moving farther away from your subject will increase DOF. You can also stop the lens down a bit for the closer shots to increase DOF without affecting the exposure too much.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Shoot from a tripod with cable release, static subject - then you will know if the lens is OK. If there is a sharpness problem - check for bac/front focusing. If there is none - the lens may be a dud. But most likely you will find out that you need to practise with this settings in order to get usable images. And this includes focusing/camera shake/subject moving etc.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I discovered that for kids when running around, a flash is much much better than opening up the aperture so wide. I've learned to use a diffuser and bounce the light so it doesn't cast shadows and it looks very natural, while having the aperture at 2.8 or 4, to keep the entire face in focus.<br>

The 1.4 is ok under very controlled circumstances, when you're going for the artsy look, but it's difficult as you've found out, to get any shots of quality.<br>

SOS</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I'm using the sigma 30mm f/1.4 and a zuiko (manual) 50mm f/1.4 a lot for playing kids. I have accepted that quite a few photos are to some extent out-of-focus due to the tiny DOF. But as I like making indoor available-light photos, I'm OK with it.</p>

<p>On the other hand, raising ISO 1-2 steps, and closing the aperture 1-2 stops helps quite a bit to increase DOF.</p>

<p>I do love my (Haoda) manual focussing screen: it allows my eyes to confirm focus for both AF and manual lenses, which is really nice for wide aperture lenses.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I think you are trying to use the lens for pictures it is not suited to capturing. No lens at f1.4 is going to be very effective on moving subjects, and that includes moving subjects that are just sitting and talking. The DOF is just too shallow to control effectively unless you are very careful. Careful and kid photography are not very compatible.</p>

<p>You will just have to accept a large number of pictures where the focus plane is not where you want it if you use it much. I agree with Stephen that you would probably be better off to get a really good flash unit and learn to bounce and diffuse it. You could use a zoom at a smaller aperture and likely get a lot more "keepers" with the flexible framing of the zoom and the deeper DOF of the smaller aperture.</p>

<p>Otherwise, all you can do is stop it down to get better DOF, and raise the ISO to get your shutter speed up to something useful. It's that, or get the kids to be very quiet and still. Good luck.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I have an original metal mount 50mm f/1.8 from my film days, but I hardly ever use it with my digital camera, preferring to use my assortment of zooms. Like the original poster, many photogs seem to really like the f/1.4 and the f/1.8 and always seem to promote them as good value lenses, especially the f/1.8. With the lack of DOF, shooting at 1.8 or 1.4 is more or less useless unless one wants the small area in focus and the rest out of focus for artsy reasons. The only real reason to use these fast lenses to me would be the relative ease of focusing in low light, but shooting stopped down to get decent DOF in anything.<br>

<br />As has been mentioned, shooting active children and pets with flash is the best way to go for me. Since I discovered a flash diffuser, shooting with it produces good shots that do not look like flash. Before using the diffuser, I bounced the flash off the ceiling and had a home made silvered reflector panel at the back of the flash. Got the no name diffuser for my 430EX on eBay for about $6.00.</p>

<p> </p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Rob, thanks I use them often in the past.<br>

Tha point I wanted to make was that at f/1.4 as already mentioned it is likely that both eyes will not be in sharp focus unless exactly on the same focal plane.<br>

(and) At f/2.8 DoF is only increased to 1cm at 50cm distance. Now I don't know about you but my nose tip is a little more than 1cm away from my eye so it may still be OOF.<br>

IME f/4 usually saved the day for getting at least one eye in sharp focus and two if you're careful although my 10D was a little flaky on AF with this lens.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Alex I just bought a Canon 28 f/1.8 for my 40D to give a "normal" angle of view, comparable to a 50mm on a full frame, but I have a similar challenge when it comes to autofocusing. Often I keep my right thumb on the AF selector button and try to quickly toggle between the appropriate AF point while looking through the viewfinder. Other times I will just use the center AF point and focus/recompose. Other times I will just manual focus in live view when my little boy is still enough. If you're looking for the quickest solution I would recommend just using the center AF point and recomposing. </p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote>

<p>Tha point I wanted to make was that at f/1.4 as already mentioned it is likely that both eyes will not be in sharp focus unless exactly on the same focal plane.</p>

 

</blockquote>

<p>And would it have killed you just to make that point that straight away?</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kid shots are extremely difficult at wide apertures. The younger the kid is and the wider the aperture is and the closer you are to the subject, the more difficult to get an adequately in-focus shot. But you aren't doing anything wrong. Keep practicing with that f/1.4, wide open please, and just think of us poor fools trying to shoot the same circumstances with a Noctilux at f/1.0. :-)

Backups? We don’t need no stinking ba #.’  _ ,    J

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Hi Alex. You have a very nice camera and a super sharp, fast lens. Your problem is, you has to practice a lot with this lens, and try to had a selective focusing and always hunting for the eyes. To get a little bit more dof from the lens, close down 1 or 2 clicks, f2 or f2.8 and try again. Also! increase the ISO to min. 400 and try again. I know, you don't have a chance to use manual focusing, far as I remember, on the D40, with the 50/1.4 lens. I have this camera too, and with the kit lens, fantastic, I like it very much. With the 50/1.4 even better. Using it for casual photography, panoramas, and even landscape sometime, beside my D300 and D700. You don't need the Sigma 30/1.4 You just get wider angle on the D40 DX format, the 50mm is better for the subject you try to photograph. And the dof is almost the same at 1.4 regardless of the lens. Have a happy shooting.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I like to thank every one of you for your great feed back. I'm am quite happy I got the lens and as anything else there is a lerning curve. Shooting with something as fast is new to me. Is like going from a little 4 door sedan to a Lamborgini. Here are some pictures I took this morning. So far it's a keeper.<br>

Regards,<br>

Alex</p><div>00TCOE-129221684.jpg.a6fc5866843b5889129ea400030ea150.jpg</div>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...