dan_lee16 Posted September 27, 2009 Share Posted September 27, 2009 <p>I noticed that when I processed C41 films as positives at hom, using Xtol as a first developer (1+1, 40c, 40min), light reversal and then C41 developer as the colour developer, the image comes out nice, but I notice I have regular chromes (with some give or take on the colour balance, but not a whole lot) - the orange mask is gone.<br> When I do the same but with Rodinal/R09 one shot, the orange mask is there in all it's glory.<br> Does anyone know what is responsible for this?<br> I was thinking about trying out a modified Mytol recipe, but making it a lot stronger (to compete on the level of regular E6 first developers).</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larrydressler Posted September 27, 2009 Share Posted September 27, 2009 <p>Well Xtol is an Acid developer.... Thanks for sharing this info.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicaglow Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 <p>It might be the Ascorbic Acid that's in XTol, as Larry suggests. I was just looking at the spec sheet on XTol at Kodak's site. You might view the ingredients to see what you find. I know they listed it, I just can't recall all the ingredients, other than the Ascrobic Acid stood out to me because I didn't recall it being part of the formulation.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a._t._burke Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 <p>Gentlepersons: </p> <p>Does anybody know the filter number to neutialize the orange contrast mask? I presume it would be a different value for different films? </p> <p>Tom Burke</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jordan_w. Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 <p>XTOL contains ascorbic acid, but in its working solution (with all that sodium metaborate and sodium sulfite present) the pH is about 8. The ascorbic acid is present as the ascorbate ion under those conditions. </p> <p>I'd be really surprised if the ascorbate is able to do anything to get rid of the base colour -- that colour is very hard (or impossible) to remove, as it's present in the film base itself (not just the emulsion)</p> <p>Dan, can you post a side-by-side comparison (scans or photos of your positives) demonstrating the difference? (preferably with the edge markings showing?)</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan_lee16 Posted October 1, 2009 Author Share Posted October 1, 2009 <p>had to take a photo of the negative to show the film name on the edge in front of my ceiling light, overexposed part of the frame.. even light on it.. anyway here one is.. tungsten white balance</p> <p><img src="http://i38.tinypic.com/16583k.jpg" alt="" /></p> <p>Here is some Pro 400H, developed in the same way but with Rodinal instead, which keeps the orange mask, also tungsten WB, for comparison, can clearly see the diff.<br> <img src="http://i37.tinypic.com/29m9a1s.jpg" alt="" /></p> <p>Here is a dry scan<br> <img src="http://i38.tinypic.com/29pu2h3.jpg" alt="" /><br> And my attempt at a colour balance:<br> <img src="http://i37.tinypic.com/o5ykwi.jpg" alt="" /></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan_lee16 Posted October 1, 2009 Author Share Posted October 1, 2009 <p>forgot to mention the reala sample is one of the earlier ones i did, think it was one of the mid 30 degree celsius ones, was a bit underdeveloped and i feel there is some residual orange mask still there, but its a huge difference.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now