Jump to content

SHARPEST lenses for Nikon DSLR's


rochelle_negle

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Depends on the use and how you're printing or using. on an 8x10, I defy anyone to identify a big difference between a

50mm f1.8 or a cheapo 18-55 both stopped down to f8 or f11.

 

I think that you need to specify sharpest (or best) for a particular use. My 55mm micro is a GREAT sharp lens... also not

so great for wide-angle... ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By sharpest do you mean greatest resolving power or highest contrast, and do you mean an average across the range of f stops or a particular f stop? Are you limiting the discussion to Nikon lenses or can others qualify, including older MF lenses which work on current model Nikon DSLRs? You need to provide more info to qualify your question so an answer is possible.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<i>what lens hits it every time?</i>

<Br><Br>

None that I've ever used. By all reports, the new 14-24/2.8 is pretty swell that way. Never the less, it's sort of a silly, the-laws-of-physics-meets-real-life-but-who-cares question. "Hitting" a sharp image every time is easy, if the lens is only designed to work under very narrow circumstances, and you stay within those bounds. So, you could say that any of a number of Nikkor macro lenses jump right out... but they're only deadly sharp when used for what they're supposed to do.... which is very, very specific.

<Br><br>

So, come now... what are you <i>really</i> asking?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a more appropriate question, is what Nikon lens isn't so sharp. . .as has been mentioned, per tripod and f stop, all of mine perform well per application, except the 24-120mm which I ditched because it never was clean for me after trying three different models.

 

If you are aging, sharp ain't all that great if you get my wrinkly drift. . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question is not easy to answer a practical perspective, it's even more difficult to answer from a practical perspective, since there are so many factors determining sharpness.

 

The 50 1.8 at f/8 produces the sharpest results I know. The 24-70 f/2.8 comes very close; and though it's "slighly less sharp", it does seem to produce more vibrant and saturated colors. The 24-70 f/2.8's performance is also fairly uniform throughout its FL coverage. It's sharp even at f/2.8 (sharper than the 50 f/1.8 at f/2.8), has a buttery bokeh and minimal distortion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Rochelle was merely looking to facilitate an interesting discussion on our personal experiences and objective

opinions - not write a published research report.

 

Personally, I love the Nikon 50mm f/1.8 (I'm sure the new 1.4 is outstanding as well). I tend to imagine that you'll yield

the very best image with a prime lens as opposed to anything else, but as stated numerous times above, an f.1,4 or 1.8

(even the 2.8 lenses) result in excellent images. I love my 105mm 2.8 and even though I think the results are amazing,

I think compared side-by-side, and in the right conditions, that the prime 1.4/1.8s may be a bit sharper.

 

Good question - I'm interested in hearing what people think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been REAL happy with all my Nikkor lenses.

 

I have the 24-70mm, the 14-24mm, the 85mm and the 70-200mm and they have all been much sharper than the Canon equivalents. The Canon 70-200 was pretty nice but my 16-35mm had horrible edge to edge sharpness and 24-70mm was bad with back focusing and the typical issues that others complain about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My favorites: 16mm fisheye, 14mm, 15mm, 17-35mm, 18mm (had one that was and one that wasn't), 17-55mm, 20mm f/2.8, 24mm f/2, (the f/2.8 is good as well), 45mm f/2.8 GN and P, 50mm f/1.8, 105mm f/2.5, 105 Micro (as mentioned before), 85mm f/1.8 and f/1.4 (though the 1.8 is a little cooler), 180mm f/2.8, 200mm Micro, 300mm f/4, f/2.8 are my favorites. I shoot with other Nikkors, and I like them for other reasons besides sharpness alone. There are also others I simply don't have enough experience with. I suspect the 14-24mm is one of those for example, but not enough all around experience to know. 70-200mm f/2.8 maybe.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...