Moving On

Double/ time exposure late at night......

That is a very nice camera Mark.... Usually on extended time exposures moving the T has little if any effect on the image. As stated, simply covering the lens is a simple bit of insurance.....

www.photo.net/discuss/threads/photographing-a-full-moon.82909/

Double exposure?

[ATTACH=full]1222161[/ATTACH]

The shooting analogy was in reference to watching steel fall instead of concentrating on the front sight while moving to the next plate. And if you get the negative feedback of a miss, no "ring", through the progression, it's easy to see how the instant feedback is detrimental. Putting in golf and releasing an arrow in Archery are adversely affected by head movement to get instant feedback.... Feedback is great in the proper time and place. In some instances feedback is intentionally blocked out, delayed, to produce the desired result.

"Let me ask how many master musicians there would be, if no instrument made a sound until hours after it was played? "- Fallacious argument. Probably similar to the number of master photographers who never saw what they photographed until hours after the shutter was released. ;)

If the instant result of digital feedback provides such a great improvement in skill development, why is post capture "adjusting" of the image an ever expanding part of the process? Why so many more "useless" images? I enjoy digital, and it is indeed a great tool. But it isn't the replacement for film it has been assumed by many to be.

"Feedback is essential to the learning process, and anything that slows or interferes with that feedback is counter-productive. There's nothing new or controversial in that theory. It's proven fact." False. Try Archery. Or competitive handgun. "Peeking" destroys accuracy.

Haste makes waste.......;)