Jump to content

User_10913853

Members
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I’m a retiree interested in bird photography around our local lakes. This requires long, and heavy, telephotos and usually a monopod or tripod. I struggle to lug all this gear over my shoulder for hours on the paved trails that, luckily, have no stairs. Have any of you worked out a solution using either a golf cart or other folding (and pushable) cart? Any special tips?
  2. Jos, I don't have an extension tube that narrow, only a 20mm or so. How do you put this whole operation together? Camera mounted on downward facing tripod, enlarger stand, or what? Film holder from 35mm enlarger, improvised from scratch, or what? Diffuser from plastic milk bottle, special frosted glass, or what? Light from a light box, flash, or what? The devil is in the details, as my weeks of trying to put something together has shown me. I'm running out of patience and ready cash trying to cobble something together! Oh, and I'm not sure what you mean by noise. The graininess in the V600 flatbed's image is actually visible, in blurry form, on the DSLR images, so I'm assuming it is actually present in the film as grain and not just noise. I'd be happy to see it in the DSLR images! And I only have an 11.5X magnifier. The onscreen blowups are taking about 0.2" on the neg and blowing it up to about 7", or 35X.
  3. Tried with teleconverter attached to body, then bellows, then lens. Could not focus on the neg at all using the bellows and PS-4 film holder attached at end of bellows rails. Similarly with 55mm on bellows without the teleconverter, perhaps because of the thickness of the lens mount portion of the teleconverter, about 25mm. At least with the telextender on the lens, I could focus pretty well at appropriate framing. To use 55mm without bellows and just extension tube means having to devise (purchase) both a holder (enlarger stand?) for the camera, plus a light box or flash mount arrangement to go behind an improvised film holder. Have you actually set up and used one of these copy stands, or is it purely academic, professor_k? Suggestions appreciated, in any case!
  4. Purchased used Nikon 1.4x telextender and Nikon 55mm f/3.5 AI Micro Nikkor to use with my D90 on my Nikon bellows with Nikon PS-4 film holder mounted on Manfrotto tripod and shutter triggered remotely. I can frame the 35mm images well enough to get 2400x3600 full-frame shots, but when compared with the results I can get from my Epson V600 scanner, the sharpness is simply not there. Grain is 2x to 3x as evident on the scanner images (posted elsewhere). The scanner takes forever, so I was hoping the DSLR route would work. Had tried old 43-86 Nikkor which composed OK at about 80mm, thought the lack of sharpness was due to that mediocre glass, but found the 55mm looked essentially identical.
  5. I have an Epson V600 flatbed scanner that does a good, but very slow, job copying 35mm negs. There's a film holder that holds 2 strips of 6 negs each, and the Epson Mac software allows automatically generating separate files for each of the images, with sequential numbering based on your specified starting point. I have a lot (hundreds) of old negs I'd like to digitize, but in many cases its only a few per roll. Seems tedious to bulk scan the entire roll 2 strips at a time, at about 5 minutes per strip including setup, only to delete the majority of the files. So, I'm looking into using my D90 with Nikon bellows and slide/neg holding units to quickly digitize. Found that it's not so easy to get exactly the right focal length lens to get the entire film image in the frame and have it well focused. A 43-86 used at about 80mm did a good job of framing, but the focus was mediocre compared to the V600. Grain was crisp and perhaps even a bit overly evident on the V600, while it was noticeably softened on the D90. Well, the 43-86 was one of Nikon's poorer lenses. I figured I should use a Micro lens. Turns out that the 55mm f/3.5 attached to Nikon's 1.4x telextender attached to the bellows would frame nicely enough that I can get a 2400x3600 full frame shot. But, to my dismay, no better than the 43-86. See below for a comparison of the 55mm with the V600. D90 on left, V600 on right. One possible cause: film holder unit has to be so far from the lens that the bellows on it won't connect to the front of the lens. Ambient light interfering with sharpness? I'll try putting a black paper tube there to see if it helps. Any suggestions from anyone?
  6. Left side shows image from D90 with Nikon 1.4x telextender and Nikon 55mm f/3.5 on Nikon bellows with Nikon slide/film holder. Right side is image from Epson V600 flatbed scanner.
×
×
  • Create New...