Jump to content

nick_west3

Members
  • Posts

    28
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by nick_west3

  1. <p>If I remember correctly it was around 11 mins Mike.<br> I pulled the time from the <a href="http://wwwuk.kodak.com/global/en/professional/support/techPubs/f4043/f4043.pdf">here</a><br> Does that look like unusually large grain size to you for this film/dev combo?</p>
  2. <p>Hi Mike,<br> Thank you for your response. Here's one of the scans as requested, and also a 100% crop for you. I also took a quick shot of the strip that they came from.<br> <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5261701/img081.jpg">Image 1</a><br> <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5261701/B.jpg">100% Crop of Image 1</a><br> <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5261701/FullSizeRender.jpg">Negative Strip</a><br> Dev and Fix were approx. 20 Degrees C.<br />I did however rinse in cold tap water for 10 minutes.</p>
  3. Hi Guys, Please go easy on me as this is the first time I have developed my own film since high school. I shot a roll of T-Max 400 135 and also a roll of T-Max 400 120. I processed both, a day apart, in D76 (mixed from powder) and then scanned using my Epson V550 at 2400dpi. The 120 looks great, sharp, good contrast and fine grain. The 135 has HUGE grain, to the point where I can't even tell where focus is in the frame. The only difference between processing the two is that the D76 was 1:0 for the 120 and 1:1 for the 135. I understand that 1:0 produces finer grain but is it really that different? This seems a little extreme.. Or does it sound like I've messed up somewhere. Thanks in advance!
×
×
  • Create New...