lumusphoto

<p>Tripod, camera with full manual control, self timer or cable release, lens, wide aperture, high iso, long shutter speed oh and shoot in raw :) </p>

<p>Most people do not go to this anal level of testing - even us shooting everyday for a living. We want real world results as time is money to me whole point of the progress of a lens such as the 16-35 f4 is to spend less time in front of a computer and to maximize results in the field. I understand the need for this level of testing but there also needs to be some real world results for people using this equipment day in day out and relying on it to produce the result which will inevitably put food on the table.<br> I do however appreciate what you guys are saying and understand the need for vigorous robust testing.</p>

<p>I'm looking forward to testing this for my youtube channel. It definitely looks an improvement on the 17-40L but saying that it is 11 years old now lol! Thanks for posting the images though :)</p>

<p>What was it like at higher apertures? I recently reviewed my 17-40L <a href=" and once stopped down the corner detail was very impressive. There are test shots in the video. Am interested to see more testing from the 16-35 as it looks like another cracker from canon!</p>

<p>Sent you an email Thomas</p>

<p>Hi Thomas, I shoot property as my day job and have to 17-40 on a 6d and it works beautifully. All I will say is the more you can learn about interior photography the better as this will help you make the decision for what type of work flow you want. Like will you be shooting for higher end real estate or will it just be a run and gun situation grab the shots and on to the next job? I'm guessing you will be working with a tripod if so then save your cash and get the 17-40L.<br> Before I upgraded to the 6d I had a 60d with the sigma 10-20mm and my clients couldn't even tell the difference if I'm honest! <br> Good luck with the real estate work!</p>

<p>Sounds like exciting times ahead for you! I personally keep clients images saved to a seperate hard drive in case they ever want more copies or if they lose or damage the CD/USB stick images are given on.<br> Every year or so I will go through my files and trim out the oldest ones and start the cycle again but speaking with other photographers, they all seem to do things their own way to suit their professional needs and what works for them etc.<br> Hope this helps you out and hope you enjoy your shoots coming up!<br> All the best,</p> <p>Leon</p>

<p>Hello Hakan, I have been shooting with the 6d for a couple of months now. I debated between this and the 5d mkiii. I was expecting to be disappointed with the 6d's focusing system but the center focusing point is a lot more sensitive in low light so that was a big added bonus as it can focus even when it is almost dark and lock on very well! <br> What I will say is if you can afford it I would personally go for the 5d mkiii as it has a life span of 150,000 shutter actuations over the 6d's 100,000. 5d mkiii has the higher build quality and better laid out camera in my opinion after shooting with the 6d. Has a far superior auto focus system especially for sports and wildlife shooting. But on the flip side of that the 6d is slightly lighter so it depends what you want from your camera really. Image quality is stunning from both the sensors hence why I opted to save a bit of money and go for the 6d. <br> Have a full review up on my <a href="http://www.lumusphoto.com">site</a> with high res example images, and have a review on my <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/lumusphoto">youtube</a> channel if you want to check it out.<br> Hope this helps you out, you have some gorgeous glass to shoot with I must say! <br> All the best,</p> <p>Leon</p>