dxin
-
Posts
207 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by dxin
-
-
<p>Hi, Laurie,<br>
I checked the website, very useful, although little luck, but I'll keep on looking for some other options.<br>
<br />Lex,<br>
VGA camera seems to be attractive. But I think I prefer phone with more recent sensor technologies and some basic smart features.</p>
<p>Wouter,<br>
Yes, I saw the ONE, and ONE MINI. Even though there's a MINI version, it's still too big to me.</p>
<p>Thanks everyone.</p>
-
<p>Hi, guys.</p>
<p>As a long time photography enthusiastic, I'm very NOT interested in most of those camera phones with tiny pixels.<br>
I'm very satisfied with the 3.2MP camera on the Pantech P8000 that I've been using for two years.<br>
I'm looking for a new phone with similar features: low MP, small in physical size, and QWERTY keyboard would be a plus.<br>
Any inputs?</p>
<p>Thanks<br>
Dehuan</p>
-
<p><img src="https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3875/14458260248_f3575636e5_o.jpg" alt="" /><img src="https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5565/14621876736_25c0498b3b_o.jpg" alt="" width="1280" height="864" /></p>
-
<p>My favorite, picked it up at a camera show for $10.<br /> Amazing, very high eye point.</p>
-
<p>Why 35mm slr lens? (Why not keep the GX680 lens?)</p>
-
<p>A photographer just posted a few test images taken with Mitakon's new 50/0.95 and Sony A7.<br>
Original post can be found here: http://www.weibo.com/3027937725/B04tP5Kvu<br>
Here are the images:<br>
http://ww3.sinaimg.cn/large/b47aa9bdjw1efhzpl2sjnj20m80xc0wh.jpg<br>
http://ww2.sinaimg.cn/mw1024/b47aa9bdjw1efhzpoz6vpj20xc0m8788.jpg<br>
http://ww1.sinaimg.cn/mw1024/b47aa9bdjw1efhzppubx8j20xc0m80x3.jpg<br>
http://ww4.sinaimg.cn/mw1024/b47aa9bdjw1efhzprp5jej20xc0m8dl3.jpg<br>
http://ww3.sinaimg.cn/mw1024/b47aa9bdjw1efhzpw968hj20xc0m8dj8.jpg<br>
http://ww1.sinaimg.cn/mw1024/b47aa9bdjw1efhzq0nlmvj20xc0m8q8l.jpg<br>
http://ww1.sinaimg.cn/mw1024/b47aa9bdjw1efhzs3an4xj20xg0mcjxt.jpg<br>
http://ww4.sinaimg.cn/mw1024/b47aa9bdjw1efhzuwvjv1j20m80xctcl.jpg<br>
http://ww2.sinaimg.cn/mw1024/b47aa9bdjw1efhzuyp0krj20xc18gwrc.jpg</p>
<p>Mitakon earlier said that this lens would be shown at Beijing P&E (Apr 25-28) and would be available by the end of this month. <br>
It'll be interesting to see what F0.95 can do on the A7S. <br>
What do you think?</p>
-
<p>Many cameras can do 50MB/s through USB 2.0, which is about 2-3 20MP full size RAW images per second.<br>
Connect to a computer with Nikon Camera Control Pro 2, my Nikon D60 shoots infinitely at 3.5 fps. Note that D60 only shoots a 5 burst with the fastest SD card.<br>
<br />Just some interesting off topic facts.</p>
-
<p>The pitfall of buying a computer is that, the basic configuration is incredibly low priced to catch your attention, but the upgrade features raise the price sky high.<br>
This is the computer I just bought, or semi-built. You can see in the list that adding 8GB DDR3 to the second DIMM costs $550. That's insane! <br>
http://shop.lenovo.com/us/en/servers/thinkserver/towers/ts140/<br>
<br />So, I decided to only order the E3 1245 processor, mainboard, and case from Lenovo. And I bought 2 1TB enterprise class HDD and 4 8GB ECC DDR3 from other sources.<br>
In this way, I got Lenovo warranty, top end enterprise class components that fits my need, within around $1100. I can't ask for more.<br>
--------------------------------<br>
If you have symmetrical multi displays, using a graphics card like nVidia NVS might be a good idea.</p>
-
<p>I'm not sure the images are displayed. I just reloaded them.<br>
http://i502.photobucket.com/albums/e426/d_xin/R0040078_01_zps0146ff35.jpg<br>
http://i502.photobucket.com/albums/e426/d_xin/R0040084_zpsd8ee3b1a.jpg</p>
-
<p>I know that a flash meter is a good tool to determine the amount of exposure.<br>
But ultimately we always judge the exposure perceptually. However we adjust exposure, before taking the picture or during post processing, we do whatever we can to make the picture <em><strong>look good</strong></em>.<br>
<br />Here is a picture I took. The meter measures a F4.5. I adjusted the camera to F2.8 and the picture looks good on the camera's screen. But when I loaded it to my computer, I still found it a little dark.<br>
Then I post processed it to +0.7EV to make it look good on the computer, but at the same time it looks over exposed on the camera.<br>
<strong>My question is, what does the correct exposure look like?</strong> A quick answer might be, <em>which of the following pictures you think looks better?</em><br>
How do you determine the total brightness of the picture? Meter? Histogram? What if the it looks perfect on the meter and histogram but the picture is just a little bit darker/brighter than you want it to be?<br /><br>
Any input will be helpful. Thank you.<br /><br>
<br>
<img src="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/newuploads/ulh3p.jpg" alt="" width="698" height="471" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/newuploads/8fusz.jpg" alt="" width="696" height="460" /></p>
-
<p>Late version of Tamron 28-75 has a built-in motor. Like other Tamron lens, it's a AF-I type, slower than AF-S but works.</p>
<p>Below is a picture of this version. Note the 8 contacts.<br />
<p>Here is the D version with aperture ring. See there are only 5 contacts. There's also a "screw driver".<br /> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tamron-SP-28-75-F-Mount.jpg</p>
<p>I'm not sure whether there's another version between the two: G type, no aperture ring, no built-in motor. I can't find a picture for that one.</p>
-
<blockquote>
<p>low light performance</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I really doubt it. Dropping pixels also drops effective sensor area.</p>
-
<p>You are better off with a more video-oriented mirrorless or camcorder. Those don't drop pixels hence can use digital anti-aliasing filter.</p>
-
<p>PC cord.<br>
Manual.</p>
-
<p>A group of parents is different from a pair of parents.<br>
One says some good of the picture, and then another agrees, and then the snow ball starts to roll. <br>
Within five minutes, the picture becomes "excellent".<br>
Then one buys one for their kid, the others must buy some for theirs, too.</p>
-
<p>The M mount lenes.</p>
-
<p>Last time I checked adorama, they still have new Mamiya 7II and Fuji GF670.</p>
-
<p>They designed Nikon 1 for the third world (<em>the vast population inland</em>), and now they are complaining about people being too smart to buy them? ROFLMAO</p>
-
<p>Are <a href="http://show.smzdm.com/detail/14797">this</a> and <a href="http://newbbs.fengniao.com/2687573.html">this</a> what you are talking about? It seems that there's no significant vignetting, but the resolution in the corners is pretty poor.</p>
<p> </p>
-
<p>IMO longer lens is better because it flattens the picture, but it can be difficult to have a clear view with a lot of people walking around. I waited for almost 10 minutes to <a href="/photo/17671860">take this picture</a>.<br>
Manual focus does not seem to be an issue because most of the time you are hyperfocusing.</p>
-
<p>Maybe <a href="http://www.colinmichaelphoto.com/blog/2012/06/26/paso-wine-bottle-photography/">this</a> can give you some basic ideas.</p>
-
<p>D3 is known for its high ISO sensitivity and high fps at its time, which is favored by news and sport photographers.<br /> But mega pixels and dynamic range is less-than-satisfactory.<br /> If you want a new tool for landscape and portrait, maybe a D5200 with the right set of lenses do a better job.</p>
-
<p>They are the 35mm film versions of 18-55 and 550-200, which worth less than $150 in total.<br>
I suggest simply choose the camera you like without worrying very much about these two lenses.</p>
-
<blockquote>
<p>I'd like to increase the shutter speed to relieve the burden of the flash.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That's not going to happen. HSS always cuts 1 stop more flash power than ND filter.<br>
At a shutter speed 1 stop above X-sync speed, HSS will cut the GN by 2 stops, or, a half. But with a 1 stop ND filter to bring the shutter speed down to X-sync, it only cut the GN by 1 stop.<br>
See SB-900 user manual Page F19 and F20.</p>
Thermal imaging with smartphones and tablets
in Casual Photo Conversations
Posted
<p>For the IR part, yes, but only a little bit of short wave IR, or, near IR.<br>
For the thermal part, no. You'll need multiply sensors to capture light of different wavelengths. It's the spectrum that carries temperature information, not strength. <br>
For the see through clothing, yes but with limitations. There must be a lot of available IR light to create strong IR reflection, a sunny noon will be best. And the target has to be very reflective, and the material of clothes also matters.<br>
Above, my motorcycle.<br>
Middle, my motorcycle and my t-shirt.<br>
Bottom, my motorcycle, t-shirt, cellphone and IR filter.</p><div></div>