Jump to content

anand_dhupkar

Members
  • Posts

    165
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by anand_dhupkar

    D700

    <p>I have a question - I would say a slight variation to the original post - to the folks who responded saying they have D300 as well as D700. How would they rate D300 for the high ISO / low light shooting, against D700 ? I would say around 3400 ISO ? Is comparison chart available anywhere as Dave Lee put for D700 ?</p>
  1. <p>Hi - Have been watching quite some days, This is my first posting on this forum, I am a nature lover - keen on capturing nature in different seasons. What I enjoy most is when it is just changing from one season to another - that gives me a lot of opportunities - This one is Spring - a bit late, though. Hope you folks like it. All comments welcome ..<br>

    This is with Nikon D70s - I think it was with Tokina 12-24 </p><div>00TY7F-140575584.jpg.16d761b9689cc72c10ecef8e44398294.jpg</div>

  2. <p>See if you have any option - other than drag and dropp. I have recordnow that came with my dell and works really fine. It does have a drag and drop option, I somehow never used it, I always use 'select folder' option and works fine. I used many CDs so far to store my pictures and sometimes I had bad disk - as soon as I start burning, it spits out disk saying it is full - eventhough it is absolutely blank, so I put in another disk. But other than that, I did not have this kind of problem. I never burnt the DVDs so far, though. However, I think it would work same way.<br>

    By the way, I always user RW disks so I don't have to wait till I have diskfull images. I go on packing up as and when I want to ...</p>

     

  3. <p>I think Nikon should come up with modular approach in the digital camera bodies. I have been using D70s for over three years now. What I really want is low noise at high ISO from D700. I would like Nikon to come up with a modular replacement where I can change the sensors and related software. Is it too much to ask ?</p>
  4. <p> If you are just an avid shooter especially shooting your daughter and cycle racing, I think, D90 would have been a better choice - especially for its HD movie mode ... I think HD movie feature of the D90 has bridged gap of video camera and Digital still camera - letting one shoot many events kids/sports would present unexpectedly or in bettre words when you are not even thinking of it .. Many a times, I have thought I should have had a movie camera with me ..<br>

    But again, it is a thought - if you are one of those folks who neve - I mean never like to do video, you are good with what you bought. This is basically so because when you have a video camera with you, you kind of tend to watch everything through your viewfinder and can't really enjoy the things happening in front of you .. </p>

     

  5. I would say with these electronic equipments, it is better to have protection plan - irrespective of how careful you are with your equipment. I have D70s a pretty strong camera, I have to say. And I take real care of that - at the same time, I do always carry it with me. Whereever I go, I always have it with me in a lowepro bag. Once, without any warning, sign or anything, when I took it out of the bag and switched it on, for no reason the flash popped up and would go down. Something went wront with it - without even using it (I don't like using flash, I prefer available light). I had purchased the protection plan and it helped.
  6. I have been reading this thread and have a question to those who said they moved from from D70 or D80 to D300.

     

    I have have been shooting with D70s and am just an amateur photographer, shooting everything I feel I like. I, however, prefer to do available light photography as far as possible. I avoid using flash. From that perspective, would I find a lot of difference moving from D70s to D300 ?

     

    Thank you in advance.

×
×
  • Create New...