brian_e

So a photo of a painting would be a derivative work of the painter?

It's probably more complicated than that. I always understand the "theory" of copyright to be the expression of the idea rather than the idea itself.

Thank god I'm not the only one - I felt like such a moron as I searched everywhere for the little bump.

I still forget sometimes if I don't use the camera for awhile. ;)

there's a book on it, i forget the name of the guy.

20 seconds on google answered the question - dan burkholder.

http://www.danburkholder.com/Pages/main_pages/page1_main.htm

next time try google, it is the oracle. ;)

agreed - ebay is a great pricing tool.

and... if i knew how to repair it, i'd buy it for $100 less than the cost of the parts, so you might be able to get more than (base price - Canon quoted repair cost).

Heather - sorry to hear about your ordeal.

As far as the ethics go - I think you will be able to find someone with an opinion on the matter at every step in the spectrum from "dirtbag paparazzi" to "respectful artiste" (you can see my personal bias from the adjectives).

There is no generally accepted social norm on this one. Some people think that a public image of an individual in no way belongs to that individual. Others will say using an image of an individual is taking something from that individual and that permission should be given.

Each individual photog has to make the choice for himself based upon his own personal values. Where that deviates from the subject's personal values, there will be conflict.

I'm only comparing to lenses I've owned and used:

Image quality: better than the 28-105 (but bigger and heavier); not as good as 70-200/4 or 100/2.8 or 50/.18.

Versatility: superb for the price. Decent quality for a non-L, but this lens shines in that it is your "if I can bring only one lens" lens. The IS is great and the zoom range is perfect for sightseeing and casual photography.

Build quality: decent, better than 28-105 for example, but nothing like L lenses or the primes I have.

I don't know what you're looking for here, I'm just another numbskull giving you a review, not sure what else I can do - other than to tell you to rent one or buy one from a place that accepts returns and try it out.

Leonard, thank you for that explanation. Perfect example of what is good about photo.net.

I learned something new today, and that is good.

Ronald - for my prints that I store in a binder, I just use the plastic 8.5x11 sleeves and I don't worry about the uneven borders.

i always find it interesting that so many self-portraits of photogs

hide their face/identity. not surprising, just interesting.<div></div>

"More digital bashing based on ignorance."

Geez, instead of flame the guy, why don't you be helpful Chuck? Comments like that are what is wrong with internet discussions.

I didn't read the post as digital bashing per se - did you see the "I guess" part? Give him the benefit of the doubt, I don't interpret the original post as that provocative.

Bah.

I've tried quite a few different configurations - dedicated backpacks (Microtrekker), shoulder bags, hip bags, fanny packs, etc.

99% of the time now I do one of two things: I either put body + 2 lenses in a decent sized fanny pack and either sling it across my body or maybe carry it fanny pack style. in this mode i just carry my tripod in hand. i can usually fit a nalgene bottle plus a snack somewhere, so this setup is good for 3-4 hour hikes.

for longer hike or when i want to carry more than 2 lenses, i use an REI backpack (while my Microtrekker and other Lowepro bags stay in the car, lol) that I picked up for $40. I find I don't like the Microtrekker opening style - I like the toploading backpack with a few pockets on the sides and top for sundry items. With this setup, I can easily carry body, 3 or even 4 lenses, filters, accessories, spare jacket and socks, lunch, water, etc.

Save yourself some money - no need to waste your cash on dedicated photo backpacks like i did.

oh btw, i haven't been to central camera's store, but it looks like they are in the loop. helix's downtown store is a taxi ride from the loop, but it can be a bit difficult to get a taxi back. you could always call a taxi, so it's more inconvenient than anything else.

you may want to do the call, order, hold thing with central instead, depending upon your plans while you are in town.

the downtown helix store is ok, but i've had times they haven't had what i'm looking for.

if i were you i would call helix in advance and ask for prices and have them put what you want on hold.

those sure look like red-ring L lenses to me... anyone recognize

them?

http://www.superwasp.org/firstlight.html

here's the real question you have posed:

would i rather have both the 17-40 and 28-135 or just the 24-70?

for my style (landscape/all around/macro and light on people/event photog) it's an easy choice. if you're a pro wedding photog or pro event photog, then i'd probably say the 24-70 would be of more use. personally, i'd much rather have the 17-40 + 28-135 bundle versus 24-70 only - but my answer is think about what you like to photograph and that will give you the answer.

a little more on my experience with the lenses you mention:

btw, for my money, the 28-135 is a very good all around lens. when i'm traveling light it's great - i just toss this lens and my 70-200 + 1.4TC into a bag and it makes for a relatively compact but extremely versatile kit. IS _is_ all it's cracked up to be. on my 10D this lens is a bit long, but still usable, and on my 7e it's perfect.

my favorite lens by far is my 70-200/F4. relatively light and amazingly sharp throughout its range.

the 100/2.8 is also a great lens if you are into macro photog, it is redundant for portraits, imo, if you already have the 70-200.

i've got the velbon - it is nice, but it is a compromise. it is NOT stable in wind or heavy weather, so set your expectations accordingly.

i take the 343 with me on light out of town trips or camping trips where photography is not the, ahem, focus.

if photography is a main part of the trip, then pack the tylenol and carry your regular tripod.