nomade

Nice mood, but for my taste it needs a person inside the picture...

Memories of the past... A classical shot, that never again will be.

About your question in the critique... You don't need to do **anything**, it is perfect!!

I like this much more than the other -similar- one, with rose background...

Have you saturated colors here like the others in your folder or is it just the way your camera take them? It's gorgeous!!

If you're concerning about ethics in street photgraphy, you'd like for sure to read the thread **after** the 'Street Photograph' chapter in the Learn section of this site. There's some good concepts there...;-)

Why does it looks so 'washed'? Is it overexposed? May be a circular polarizer can help to get warmer colors...

I would like to see the woman in focus. Or is just an scanning problem?

This is ex-tra-or-di-na-ry!! A world inside a drop. I never give 10/10 to nobody before, this is the first time...

What is it? Some kind of gargoille with... something in his hands?

You've done a good work here!! I like your little girl, the candid way she's looking at the camera, the 'smooth' mood and the softness of the tones. Congrat!!

The subject is out of focus. But I like the way it looks... If you keep on trying, you could get a very good shot!!

What you have here is typical problem with black animals: they literally 'swallow' all the light. As they doesn't reflect any light, your camera cannot catch the details.

 

Have you try openning the aperture of your camera even more?

May be a little less grainy for the face's skin can be better. But I like what you intended, this kind of contrast against the sharpness of the eyes and lips.

Wow!! What for strong colors you have here!! So beautifull!!

Subtle! I like it!

Well: as a composition of 'reallity'... hmmm, the cloud over the moon is too brillant. May be you can have something better with the moon a little smaller and pasted on one side, not so centered... , IMHO.

 

But seems you have a great shot there, the one of the sea. I would like to see it alone. Is it possible??

Quiet good, may be you need a grandmother over there, reading or something...

I like it, good composition, lightning and film resolution. But as many of this kind of shots, it needs somebody in the picture, to give a 'human touch'...

It was a little difficult for me to guess what really it is... For me it is underexposed.

For the shots I've seen till now, to blurr doesn't work for abstract. IMHO

 

Well done! It's not so easy to make an **original** macro of a flower...

may be too much black at the bottom, but the rest is ok.

I like the way that light reflects on the sky.

If you're experimenting with handpainted B&W, may be you'd like to take a look to the works of this guy:

 

http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo.tcl?photo_id=405993

 

It's incredible!! Don't lose it!!

I never imagined that you can get such a clear image of the milky way without a telescope... As I was a kid, I used to take shots of the stars trails, but never could get one like this.

 

Seems to be a little grainy -that obvious for the ISO 1000 film you've used. This grane confuses with the stars. For sure you'll get a better shot with a lower iso film and with a tracker.

Dave: may be you can deduce something from the media punctuation of the photo: seems that everybody is saying that's may be not so aesthetical, but it's ORIGINAL!!

 

This shot makes me laugh everytime I see it, and that much better than seeing one time after another the same flower macro photos. Some of them are cute, but... it's starting to boring me!! :-))