lew_carver
-
Posts
107 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Everything posted by lew_carver
-
<p><img src="http://i86.servimg.com/u/f86/17/50/72/69/appala10.jpg" alt="" width="700" height="456" /><br> Appalachian Spring</p> <p> <img src="http://i86.servimg.com/u/f86/17/50/72/69/pine_o10.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="700" /><br> Pine on Pluton </p>
-
<div></div>
-
I find the composition surprisingly effective, thanks for sharing. -
<div></div>
-
<div></div>
-
Artist: Robert; Exposure Date: 2016:02:16 10:04:16; Make: Panasonic; Model: DMC-FZ200; ExposureTime: 10/4000 s; FNumber: f/4; ISOSpeedRatings: 100; ExposureProgram: Normal program; ExposureBiasValue: 4294967263/100; MeteringMode: Pattern; Flash: Flash did not fire, compulsory flash mode; FocalLength: 27 mm; FocalLengthIn35mmFilm: 150 mm; Software: Ver.1.0 ; ExifGpsLatitude: 48 49 48 48; -
<div></div>
-
summer sorely missed<div></div>
-
The text makes this a conceptual piece as well as visual. Clearly the intent is art as propaganda and its message is clear, if a trifle adolescent (but here that may not be a liability). Personally I do not care for this image but it works well in terms of its apparent intent and I would rate it a fairly high rating.. As it is a conceptual work it seems reasonable to comment on that content. It is difficult for most to separate the person from their work. If one loves a person's work it is hard not to transfer that feeling to the person regardless of their transgressions. For example Wagner was nasty little anti-Semitic pamphleteer . But his evil is (mostly) forgotten and irrelevant to the appreciation of his music (not that I consider Bowie much more than a commercially driven craft's person). In any case as a species we are a mixed lot. -
<div></div>
-
<div></div>
-
Beautiful composition, and the feeling of the tension between its industrial subject and the elegance of its expression makes it an aesthetically compelling experience for me. -
Good or bad, honest opinions are always of interest. -
<div></div>
-
<div></div>
-
<p>North Carolina Mountains, 12 inches. Forecast. Cold and Bleak, 50% chance of misery changing to depression later in the season.<br> <img src="http://i68.servimg.com/u/f68/17/50/72/69/bleak_13.jpg" alt="" width="700" height="466" /></p>
-
Artist: Robert; Exposure Date: 2016:01:24 12:24:00; -
<div></div>
-
<div></div>
-
Panasonic FZ200, taken at the Crete Aquarium, Thalassokosmos<div></div>
-
<p><img src="http://i68.servimg.com/u/f68/17/50/72/69/rocktr11.jpg" alt="" width="700" height="447" /><br> D7200 Nikkor 17-55mm</p>
-
<p>B&H has the 11-20mm "on sale" for $424. I had been conflicted between the AF-S DX NIKKOR 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED and the Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 AT-X116 Pro DX. But this thread and a number of reviews and posts and the extra top end convinced me. Mine, the 11-20mm is on order. <br /> <br /> Thanks to all and especially Rodeo Joe.</p>
-
<p><img src="http://i68.servimg.com/u/f68/17/50/72/69/grapev10.jpg" alt="" width="700" height="333" /><br> Grapevine - Details </p>
-
<div></div>
-
<p>My thanks for all the posts and good ideas for dealing with moisture. There may be a subtext here that I am misinformed as to the value of weather “resistance” rating for lenses and cameras but from the Tokina 11-16mm AT-X 116 PRO DX II specs page: “** Please note, the Tokina AT-X 116 PRO DX lens itself is not waterproof or water resistant”. Otherwise it would be my choice for a UWA zoom.</p> <p>Do people here shoot in rainforests (in the rainy season) with non weather “resistant” lenses and without problems?</p> <p>Again thanks.</p> <p> </p>
