cyril_jayant1

This seem to me a processing, scanning problem or in camera problem. If you look closely into the negatives if you see any traces of chemical or water marks or scratches then it could be the origin of the problem. For me, I never believe the story of any Xray fogging could make such marks. Many people talks about the Xray but they don't have any proof to show but always talk something that has not happened to them. That has not personally happened to me going through several airport X-Ray machines and over several times. Best way is before using the new films and if you have several try to use a film which is completely different from this batch and give it to a different lab and compare the result. If you have the same problem then it is origin of your camera. I don't know what camera is yours most of the Leica cameras are very reliable and light proof.

<p>Thank you, Charles. Now I got the clear picture and Now I got the clear picture and understand how the domain name works and what's it roll is.So I must get the domain name, go for that. perhaps find a provider and purchase it to run on the WP.<br> Thank you for the information, Charles. </p>

<p>I am an Analogue photographer. 2016 was my least use of negatives I guess.<br> Normally I am used to doing a lot of B&W / Tri-x.<br> This year I'll be hopefully continuing to catch up with the delay.</p>

<p>Hello, There!<br /> I am looking for help to create a Photo website.<br /> I am having an Idea about Square Space or Wordpress. Word press provides a domain address while you get registered and Square Space too.<br /> If I get Wordpress free version as the beginning stage, I get the Domain and is that not valid enough later, onto upgrading your Site to a higher level?<br /> So is it necessary to buy the Domain from the very beginning? and going forward?<br /> Thanks for the help and giving me the answers. These question could seem a bit silly. But it is something complicating to me as I know nothing in this area.<br /> Thanks a lot again.</p>

<p>My one and only M digital is M8. I got it upgraded and it is far more better than M8.<br> It is better than any MDidigi ( Except M Monochrome ) Only thing is it is not full frame but as long as you are used to it's crop factor you can master it easily. The Colours are unique and CCD Kodak sensor is the reason behind all. This camera is limited in so many ways due to discontinuing. It's major after sales, spare parts and repairs are limited. They are not available anymore. <br> So the camera will be ended up as a paper weight one day.<br> So get the maximum out of it while it is living.</p>

<p>It depends on how you defined the sharpness. Just like the debate of contrast sharpness in the photo is individual. Sometimes I like my photos sharp and not very sharp depending on the content of the image.Some non-Leica can produce excellent photos just non-comparable to a sharp photo done through a Leica lens. <br> But it is not the real different aspect of the Leica and the other brands to my personal experience. It is the difference of the luminosity of contrast of a print that gives the first impression. I found this on my own experience in darkroom prints I did. I have found a less luminosity on other lenses but on Leica it was more beautiful and a higher quality that adds to the contrast as the sharpness. So I had invested on few Leica lenses I use on my Leica M cameras. </p>