Jump to content

richard_john_edwards

Members
  • Posts

    1,991
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Image Comments posted by richard_john_edwards

  1. Alf

     

    Wonderful landscape, works very well in Black and white Good tonal range in all . Love the clouds, they cap off the scene very nicely. Sorry its been a while since i commented , I have been travelling over the last 2 months and have not had much time for PN.

  2. I am now going to offer my critique based on, the “title” and then based on what Gerry has explained in terms of intent.

    Firstly the title: SEEN BETTER DAYS – My first reaction to the image was that the elderly woman was the subject and that the title referred to her. I actually thought the title worked. I did not see the elderly lady as a homeless person nor did I see her as a complete stranger. I did not think that the image degraded or put her in a negative context at all (processing included). Yes she is in a wheel chair yes she is old, the title implies that has not always been the case. Although she could have always been in a wheel chair! The chair certainly shows signs of extensive use. The scene could be read as a place where time was enjoyed, it could also be read as a place she shared with a special person and where special memories are held. This was actually confirmed by the artist. To that end he has been successful.

    Secondly the explanation: the reference to the shelter as the item that has seen better days does not quite work for me, it is secondary in the image. The photographer should have composed differently and presented differently to get that message across. He should have dominated the scene with the shelter in some way, and used the elderly woman as a clue , this could have been achieved by separating her form the left edge of the shelter having her face obscured from view looking at the shelter, ie being a figure. He could have used depth of field to isolate the shelter from the elderly lady, once again implying her connection to place. As others have stated dodging and burning could have been used to further emphasis what is subject and what is context. The photo does not fulfil the intent of the explanation

    Having been involved in a group public exhibition for a theme, “images of our elders” the brief was to portray an elderly person in a positive light. This image although not showing the woman in a positive light, does tell a story when read in context of the Title, to that end it works. And I think it would work as part of a greater body of work that was about memories of elderly people. However the image was not offered up in this regard.
    My conclusion is I like the image, I see it as an elderly woman who has seen better days, her expression makes me question has an event happened to her that makes this a bad day? The fact she is in a wheel chair is neither here nor there. It fits the title, it does not fit the explination.

  3. Wouter I strongly disagree with your position. Competence is more than technical, competence is result with intent, achieving an outcome that one sets out to achieve, and setting goals and reaching them. That’s what makes someone competent. Breaking the rules with intent to achieve an outcome and achieving the desired outcome, is competence. Some of the great works of art follow no rules, Pollock? would you state the artist is therefore incompetent? Especially if they never followed the rules? NO. One measures ones success and competence by measuring the outcome against the intent. I agree that you cannot disregard the title as that genie is now out of the bottle. That is a failing of Gerry. Give an image a title at your own peril!! I don’t agree with Stephen on the issue of titles and he and I have had this debate before, I respect his position but I don’t agree with it. Back to the image at hand: It is competent when put in context of the rest of Gerry’s work, we can measure this by reflecting on the body of work that is his folio. This image is not a mistake, it had intent. It also demonstrates the skill of the photographer, because of all of the items I mentioned above. It does push the bounds, and the fact that it has pushed all of your buttons, suggest to me that it is very successful as an image. It is not an image that sits on the fence and follows rules (including composition). Perhaps that was Gerry’s mistake, he did not play it safe, and he chose to push the bounds. But in my view they are not overly exaggerated, the responses to me are overly exaggerated, and as state come from a position of prejudice against what is different, what confronting and what challenges the senses of sight, I would equate it to complex jazz fusion, to 90% of the population it is received as harsh, inharmonious, and confusing, to much information for the senses. This image does the same to some extent, the HDR effect and sharpness provide a lot of information and detail, but that does not make it bad, you just don’t like it, you may not get it you may even hate it, but to try telling an artist to change his or her style because it does not suite the viewers perception of what is good or bad is a nonsense. To state that the image is bad, just demonstrates that the “Nay Sayers” may not yet have developed your visual senses sufficiently to appreciate that what is different (that is what prejudice is based on). END OF RANT.

  4. I would like to see some justification of the harsh critiques (tittle aside). The enlarged image does not appear to be over processed at all. yes it has the elements of HDR but not to extreme, the ladies face is not rendered hideous, or offensive by the treatment, it highlights the elements of age. Gritty high speed film can have the same effect, that does not mean its good or bad, it is just a way of story telling. What right do all you "nay sayer's" have in badmouthing work because it is presented in a way you don't agree with, you have a right to like it or not to like it, but to describe it in terms as presented by so many of you is just as Stephanie said, playing the man and not the image.
    Demonstrate to me how the image is lacking?
    It is competently exposed
    it is competently framed
    the subjects are competently arranged
    The lady has an expression that suits the image (IMO)
    The detail is excellent
    The tonal rage is also excellent
    the tonal gradation is excellent
    so what we are left with is a bunch of opinions about taste. Critique should be more about competency, as it is competency and pushing the bounds that make for good photography, the shallow view that all images should be presented a certain way demonstrates a prejudice in artistic expression remember you don't have to like an image to know weather it is good or not and good can be defined by competencies achieved.
    Opinions are like ar$e holes, every one has one.

  5. I like the photograph and the technique used on this one, I also note that it is in keeping with your style of photography. As for the

    title, I don't agree with using titles, I like the images to speak for themselves without guidance or misguidance from a title.

    I think most of the comments are harsh and misplaced. I also agree that they to come from places of prejudice . The expression on

    the ladies face ( your mother ) is not one of a person who has seen better days, she has a tongue in cheek look in her eyes, and

    having read your replies Gerry, the expression is in keeping with that expression. Perhaps a narrative would have given better

    context. I am not a huge fan of HDR however it does have it's place, and when done well for the purpose of expression it can be

    good. In this instance it is good. The image is dynamic, the composition well thought out and the use of HDR here to give the image

    grit works. Other tea jakes may have worked better however, I am not the artist, just a viewer.

    As for awards! Awards have a place, they provide competition, and with competition comes the striving for excellence, a lot who

    criticize awards are those who have never one any or those who fear entering for fear of being judged poorly, or they are just not

    interested. I can see how this image would have won awards, it is a long way from the garbage we see here day in day out, one

    image blending into the next. This image stands out, this image pushes the bounds, this image has been well thought out and

    presented, the hobbits (elves) have chosen well. The mere fact that it has created controversy shows and demonstrates that it is an

    image of substance.

    beech grove

          7

    Wolfgang, great image, great tones, can you present a version with the top 1/4 cropped out, my opinion is that it would be stronger. It would give the image a bit more of a focal point to the trees in the background. Try it and see if you like it. But regardless of my opinion, it very good work.

    Regards Richard

    Watching

          11

    Gunnar, this is a great photograph, The details are so clear. the composition is perfect. The reflection of the woman in the middle is so well timed. This one is a classic.

    Regards Richard

  6. Alf, Great Sky, unfortunately for me the image is too flat and lacks any real focal point. The mid tone contrast needs to be enhanced and some dodging and burning done to bring out what the key elements in the photograph are. I also think with more work you could really create a bit more drama in the clouds. This is a good image that just needs more work.

    Cheers Alf

  7. When working with Landscapes, its all about composition and lighting, and Alf you seem to always pull a rabbit out of the hat. I really like the banding in this image, the composition breaks the image into sections that can be studied and admired in small chunks. Excellent work.

  8. This is also excellent. Even though most of teh image is taken up and framed by the horse, its what is going on above the horse that is great. The number adds interest and gives great contrast. Really good work Gunnar.

×
×
  • Create New...