porter
-
Posts
372 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by porter
-
-
No Egypt trip for my feline friend, unfortunately. I should have some great pics though- going for 7 months so lots of
time to see the area. Hopefully get into Israel whilst there too.
-
<p>Great shots, Sanford! I particularly like the 2nd one.</p>
<p>Last week I sold my D7000 and some lenses and got the VF-2 Viewfinder, Olympus 9-18mm and 40-150mm lenses. Now I'm light as can be for my travels to Egypt next month :D</p>
<p><a title="Untitled by Patrick E Porter, on Flickr" href=" src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6162/6176353349_be5eec5ca6_z.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="640" /></a><br>
<br />Olympus E-P2 with Panasonic 20mm f/1.7</p>
<p><a title="Untitled by Patrick E Porter, on Flickr" href=" src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6166/6178139346_3ceddbfe22_z.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="427" /></a><br>
<br />Olympus E-P2 with Zuiko 40-150mm (micro version)</p>
-
<a href=" title="Untitled by Patrick E Porter, on Flickr"><img
src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6160/6172654005_8a2d9b983c_z.jpg" width="640" height="480" alt=""></a>
<br>
E-P2 8mm fisheye
-
<p>I definitely agree that the DSLR is feeling awfully heavy these days. I'm away from home for a month (precursor to a 7 month deployment) and I only took my Nikon D7000 to see how cumbersome it would be - wow does it ever feel like a cinder block after awhile! I'm using lightweight lenses too, no hefty f/2.8 zooms in my bag at'all...</p>
<p>My E-P2 is a great camera and I really wish I brought it with me. Perhaps the D7k will find its way on to the auction block sooner than later :/</p>
<p>3 cheers for m4/3!</p>
-
Nikon D7000
in Nikon
<p>I've used mine in light rain without any problem. I wouldn't expect many cameras to have issues in light rain though. Snow is a different story, but not much of an issue either. Just carry a fine brush with you to get any snow off of it after you shoot and make sure you put it in a sealed bag of some sort prior to entering the warmer temps of a car or home.</p> -
<p><a title="Untitled by Patrick E Porter, on Flickr" href=" src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6130/5996575402_128b22fcaa_z.jpg" alt="" width="424" height="640" /></a><br>
D7000/35mm f1.8</p>
-
-
-
-
<p>Your first image simply looks like it isn't in focus. Seeing as your other two shots are in focus, I would say the first image is just user error. Other two shots look perfectly fine, not sure what the problem is with them other than diffraction. Sure they could use some post-processing to increase sharpness and contrast, but that is quite normal. </p>
<p>If you want your shots to come out differently straight from the camera, play with the image style settings until you reach something you like; to me it seems like you would like your camera set to Vivid w/ +7 sharpness, +1 contrast, -1 saturation. I usually leave my camera in Standard w/ +5 sharpness, 0 contrast, -1 saturation</p>
-
<p>D7000/70-300<br>
<a title="Dad and his Harley. by Patrick E Porter, on Flickr" href=" src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6021/5974067501_ab48283877_z.jpg" alt="Dad and his Harley." width="640" height="424" /></a></p>
-
<p>I actually just snapped this shot to see the exposure level, but I kinda like it!<br>
<a title="Untitled by Patrick E Porter, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/patrickporter/5981157072/"><img src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6129/5981157072_b336642ac1_z.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="427" /></a><br>
E-P2 with Panasonic 14-45</p>
-
<p>The parents</p>
<p><a title="Untitled by Patrick E Porter, on Flickr" href=" src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6150/5952398487_322bab8886_z.jpg" alt="" width="427" height="640" /></a><br>
E-P2/20mm f/1.7</p>
-
<p>Some interesting photos this week. </p>
<p>Boogie boarding with my lady friend</p>
<p>D7000 w/ 70-300mm</p>
<p><a title="Untitled by Patrick E Porter, on Flickr" href=" src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6004/5913912282_6daf9fd1af_z.jpg" alt="" width="424" height="640" /></a></p>
-
<p>It's a nice pic still Jose.</p>
<p><a title="In the Sea King by Patrick E Porter, on Flickr" href=" src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6046/5909794059_37966674ac_z.jpg" alt="In the Sea King" width="640" height="424" /></a><br>
D7000 with 10-24mm</p>
-
Important to mention that isn't a traditional review such as you would find here on photo.net. Nice high iso shots in that review. If
anyone is unaware of 43rumors.com that is also a good place to find info on new cameras such as the ep3.
-
<p>View from my new apartment in Halifax.<br>
<a title="Untitled by Patrick E Porter, on Flickr" href=" src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5317/5906293376_28f768b3ba_z.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="480" /></a><br>
Olympus E-P2/8mm fisheye<br>
After seeing the most recent m4/3 camera's, I think I'll just stick with what I've got =) </p>
-
<p>Vitali @ the Calgary Zoo<br>
<a title="Untitled by Patrick E Porter, on Flickr" href=" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3598/5807160650_a213365cef_z.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="424" /></a><br>
D7000 / 70-300mm</p>
-
<p>Beach got fogged in right as I got there :P Looked really cool though!</p>
<p><a title="Untitled by Patrick E Porter, on Flickr" href=" src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5184/5874914960_65aeaa8ff8_z.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="523" /></a><br>
E-P2 w/ 20mm f/1.7</p>
-
<p>Welcome to Olympus, J. I'm sure you'll love your camera more and more as the days go by. Although, I've never heard anyone complain about having to take off a lens cap, LoL.</p>
<p>I'll add my 2 cents, keeping in mind Frank's observations...</p>
<p>1) I concur that the 20mm f/1.7 is the best currently available m4/3 prime. Most of my pictures have been taken with it and I will not be switching to the 25mm when it comes out. I prefer the slightly more usable 40mm effective focal length.</p>
<p>2) I have a different take on this than Frank. I have a Nikon adapter and rarely use it. I find the lenses to be too big and manual focus is a slow, painful process.</p>
<p>3) I use the FL-36R. It isn't too too big and works wonderfully.</p>
-
<p>I actually had the Tamron 17-50 VC version when I owned a D90. It was a very nice lens, but I ditched all my DX stuff and got a D700. Then I ditched FX and got an Olympus E5. Now Im coming back round the circle with my D7000 and find myself wanting this lens again. DRAT!!! Silly? Perhaps, LoL.</p>
<p><br /> Group shot with the 17-50</p>
<p><br /> <a title="So not impressed. by Patrick E Porter, on Flickr" href=" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2711/4457157801_854b7575e8_z.jpg" alt="So not impressed." width="640" height="415" /></a></p>
-
<p>This shot was taken at 24mm (with 10-24 lens) and is a better length for groups on DX. The 10-24 is a terrible lens for this type of shot because of its difficult to correct distortion, even at the long end :/ But you get the gist.</p>
<p><a title="Untitled by Patrick E Porter, on Flickr" href=" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2114/5802551753_235fc08a40_z.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="427" /></a></p>
-
<p><a title="Andrew & Alisa's Wedding by Patrick E Porter, on Flickr" href=" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2321/5807321034_3044d8cbba_z.jpg" alt="Andrew & Alisa's Wedding" width="640" height="424" /></a><br>
In the above shot it would have been nice to step back and get a bit more in, but then they look too far away in my opinion. If I had a 24 it would have been perfect.</p>
-
<p>IMHO, the 35mm 1.8 is a must have for all DX owners. It is far too good and far too cheap not to buy it. It is great for indoor 3/4 portraits and small, non full body, group shots with about 3 or 4 people; however, If I was shooting a lot of groups, I would probably get a 24mm prime. If you don't have the cash for the 24mm f/1.4G, the older 24mm f/2.8D is a fine lens.</p>
September 24th POTW
in Olympus
Posted
<p>Another with the 40-150mm on my E-P2<br>
<br /> <a title="Untitled by Patrick E Porter, on Flickr" href=" src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6174/6182309481_f8579dde66_z.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="480" /></a></p>