derrickdehaan
-
Posts
423 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by derrickdehaan
-
-
<p>Brandy,<br>
Your nikon takes SD memory cards. The Canon 10D will take CF memory cards. Two different animals.</p>
<p>Derrick</p>
-
I cannot vouch for the ring, but I do own the twin. I bought the twin for more versitility. The flash heads are removable and have a tripod socket on the bottom of them. Of course they have adjustable output for each head as well. The twin can also be used as a master, I do not know if the ring can. So, in a nutshell, I went with the twin for its versitility and the ability to have more control over the position of the lights.
Derrick
-
Three taken with Canon 40D and Sigma 17-70 f/2.8-4.5:
http://www.photo.net/photo/7773151
http://www.photo.net/photo/7696591
http://www.photo.net/photo/7647426
Two taken with 40D and Sigma 50-500:
http://www.photo.net/photo/7862502
-
I bought my 40D with the kit 28-135. In one word....."worthless". I bet I haven't used it for 3 frames. What a stupid focal length to put in a kit. I already had a Sigma 17-70 that stay mounted 90 percent of the time. Do yourself a favor and buy the body only and get a wider zoom.
Derrick
-
I have never had a problem with my 40D of any kind.....yet.
Derrick
-
What Eric said...
-
I strongly suggest not buying from Fotoconnection. My wife got ripped off hardcore. She didn't do the research, and we got hit for about a 2500 dollar Rebel XTi with 2 cheap lenses. Beware.
Derrick
-
If third party is an option, you can look at Sigma glass. I bird with the 50-500mm myself. I am happy with the results on my 40D. The only downside is in post. In my opinion, Sigma glass needs a boost in saturation and contrast. They tend to be a tad warmer than my Canon counterparts. My lens set is split nearly 50/50 Canon and Sigma glass. Just another option to think about. I find the extreme zoom range useful.
Derrick
-
24-70 2.8L is a solid performer in my opinion.
Derrick
-
I shoot with the Sigma 17-70. I love the lens. Its built very well, and produces sharp images with very little barrel distortion on the wide end. So little in fact, I never bother to fix it. It is built very well. I really have nothing bad to say about this lens, it lives on my 40D. However, like mentioned above...I have no L glass to compair to. I do have 3 Canon lenses (28-135 which is crap, 50 1.8 and 100mm 2.8), and I must admit that the Sigmas color/contrast is not as good as my 2 Canon primes. Photoshop boosting works wonders though. I would recommend this lens to anyone on a budget, or to anyone else that my need the zoom range. I have the older non-HSM version of this lens.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=840820 Here aer some samples taken with this lens that I have shot. Disregard the 2 shots of the old tractor wheels, noise was purposely added for an older film look.
Derrick
-
It looks like a surveyer's tool to me as well. Cool looking tripod. Hope you get a camera mounted on that bad boy.
Derrick
-
My Xti did that once after having a 580 EX II mounted on it. Now I am not blaming the flash, but that was the first and only time it did it. I removed the batteries from the camera and left it overnight. Reinstalled batteries the next day and it was fine.
Derrick
-
I use the MT-24EX and find it allows more option than the ringlight. The flash heads are removable and have a 1/4 screw hole in the bottom. I mount one or both on those little tripods to experiment a little. I've even taken some shots handholding one of the heads from the side of the subject. Basically, the twin head is more versitile, but the lighting is not near as soft or even. IMHO
Derrick
-
Amazon has them listed for $500.00.
Derrick
-
It kicks the Canons butt. LOL If its worth it is a question you would have to ask yourself. Compair it more to the the Canon 1.2 and decide.
Derrick
-
I meant to say that "if really grand MOUNTAIN vistas are what you are after...."
Not Montana....
Derrick
-
I grew up in Wyoming only a few miles from Yellowstone and now that I enjoy photography, I know I would like to take a sturdy tripod and a N/D filter for the wonderful waterfalls. A circular polarizer is a must in this area as mentioned (I now live in Montana). There are more places that don't have huge vistas in Yellowstone then there are grand vistas. Meaning, many of the roads have 60+ ft tall trees on each side and some areas have rolling hills in front of you, blocking grander views. There are however many less broad views that are spectacular. the Upper and Lower falls are a must. Check out Artist's Point at the falls. Lamar Valley is where you are most likely to see wolves, and they have pups right now! If really grand montana vistas are what you are after, I would strongly suggest driving into Teton National Park just south of Yellowstone. You will find some of the most scenic mountains in the U.S. there! Have fun.
Derrick
-
Look up the tests and reviews on the Tokina 11-16 2.8.....then try to find one available.
Derrick
-
I think he means the lens body coating. White. I haven't heard of one turning yellow. Weird.
Derrikc
-
I bet it is the hinges for the pop up flash. My 400D dose the same. Pop the flash up and then shake it again.
Derrick
-
Sounds like defineatly need a backup. Why not just another old rebel if its for backup only? Then put your money towards glass.
Derrick
-
This same thing happened on my XTI. I removed the batteries over night and all went well. Then it did it again, same
fix and all is well. Both times it happened, it was after having the 580 EX II attached.
Derrick
-
I have had my 40D for a few months, bought from B&H if I remember right. I used to shoot with a Rebel XTi. Both cameras have excellent focus, in fact the 40D is superior in the number of so called "keepers" after a full day of shooting. I almost always shoot with the center focus point only in one shot mode.
Derrick
-
The 70-200 is a superior lens in my opinion.
Derrick
Which is best Canon camera and lens I should buy?
in Canon EOS Mount
Posted