Jump to content

jawphotos

Members
  • Posts

    287
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jawphotos

  1. <p>I just bought some t-max an its been awile sence I have used film my question is which one is the new tmax is it professional t-max 100 or t-max 100 professional? and is there any way to know for sure witch one I have?</p>
  2. <p>Hey guys<br>

    thanks for all the responses to my problem. Ray I dont see the 9600 anywhere on the printers listed on epsons web site. I e-mailed epson and this is there reply.<br>

    "Regrettably there are no plans to introduce a Windows 7 driver for your STYLUS-PRO-9600-UCM printer. Windows has a<strong> resident driver</strong> that you can load so that you can continue to use your printer."<br /><br />does anyone know what there talking about? this was all the info they gave me thanks epson. I know its an older printer but come on guys this is unexceptable to me and Im sure for many others.The 9600 is a work horse and has many years of life left in it.<br>

    I guess I will upgrade to the pro version of windows 7so I can run it in xp mode and when I need to replace my printer I will most likely get a canon</p>

  3. <p>The horse is dead I am sorry I said anything at all I will just live with what I get and shut up. Lets seal up the bag of worms I opened and let this post die. The image has recovered nicely and has gotten some high ratings that it does not deserve and is on avg. around 5/5 where I thought it should be to begin with.<br>

    thank you all and no hard feels<br>

    love ya</p>

  4. <p>I think you guys are missing my point. It has nothing to do with if you like it or not. It is a delibrate low rating. I got a 3/3 on another image one time that was not anonymous so I e-mail the giver just to ask why.He told me he never even hear about photo.net before. Someone had made an account in his name just to give out bad ratings. I am only wondering why ppl would do this. And Matt I didnt no nocturnal waterfalls where such common place maybe next time I should go out during a forest fire when the pine trees are ablaze maybe that would be more original.</p>
  5. <p>I was just wondering why ppl feel the need to give very low ratings to very good photos. I see it all the time on photo.net. 3/3 and 4/4 on photos that are at lease 5/5 or higher and its not just my work. Is it just me or are there ppl out there who just hate on other ppls images. I think photo.net has a responsablity to try to put a stop to it some how.The last image I posted was hit by a 3/3 rate right out the gate and I must say I'm a little pissed. Any way I think if your going to give ppl low ratings it should be with a reson why.</p>

     

×
×
  • Create New...