Jump to content

pericles

Members
  • Posts

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by pericles

  1. As a Teacher of History of Photography I think it is best to start from contemporary

    photographers and then go back to establish a connection with older photographers.

    We cannot dismiss the visual education the younger generations have had since they were

    very young and therefore (because it has been my experience) you have to hook them with

    images from their own time and then go back to the main sources. For example, they can

    see images from Flor Garduno and then go back to the roots (Graciela Iturbide, Alvarez

    Bravo, both Manuel and Lola, and in the case of mexican photography they have to study

    Weston and Tina Modotti.

    They need to see first how great contemporary photographers see the world they are

    observing and they will relate to this very easy because the students are aware that those

    images were taken in their time. And then go back and teach them about the Great

    Masters like HCB, Adams, Frank,etc.

     

    Pericles

  2. You have to remember that when you scan in color, the image will be build in pixels at the

    rate of one third each chanel (RGB) So, if the final image is 9 MB then each chanel will take 3

    MB. When you convert from RGB to gray scale or b&w, you eliminate 2 of the 3 chanels

    (usually leaves the red one) and you finish with an image with 3MB. The best solution is to

    only desaturate the image, the result will be a file that has the 9 MB and still will be an RGB

    file, with lots of info on it.

    In silver-based negatives, the original image is also a color one.

  3. I teach a class of History of Photography and one excersice I give my students in

    regard of the truth in an image, is to show them a set of pictures with captions

    choosen by me (they do not know this) and after they discuss each image and come

    to a conclusion, I show them the same set of images with another caption and

    suddenly all the arguments they built around the previous set, falls down. It is a way

    to show them that the phrase "a single picture tells more than a 1000 words" does

    not apply anymore. A picture with a caption is more powerfull than the true, and

    sometimes lethal, and examples abound: the Stanlin era, the Hitler era, and now days

    all of those who have an agenda based in the naïvite of the common people, as

    always.I do not think you have to lead people with captions, the image can stand on

    its own, giving a chance to the reader to arrive to a conclusion about what they see.

     

    Pericles Lavat

×
×
  • Create New...