coneected

<p>Can a Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED Lens be used on a Nikon N90s camera body? I am seeking a fast zoom and have come to terms with the cost of such an item, but wonder if they will be totally compatible.</p>

<p>If you lower the ISO of a particular film what type of changes to the image can one expect? Specifically I would be shooting ISO 400 film at ISO 100. Can anyone give me an idea of what to expect?</p><div></div>

<p>I have a Nikon N90s Film Camera with a Nikon 85mm f1.8 lens and I love both of them. This is the combination I would use for the remainder of my life if that were the case. The experiment I currently am participating in is using this combination for the next 12 months and see what changes take place from the beginning photos to those at the end of the year. Wish me luck.</p><div></div>

<p>I am using a Nikon N90s with a Nikon 85mm f1.8 lens. The plan is to use this combination for the next 12 months to record how, if any, does my ability to take photographs get better or worse. Please comment pro or con. Thanks. I love the Nikon N90s and with this combination I am looking forward to a great deal of wonderful photographs. For me 35mm film rules. This photograph was taken using Agfa Photo Vista Plus ISO 100 color film.</p><div></div>

<p>Thanks everyone for the quick responses. I love my N90s so much I have 3 of them and am not looking to buy a high end camera. I'll just keep taking photographs and make every attempt to improve each one. In the future maybe more glass, but the N90s as a camera suits me and what I do just fine.</p>

<p>Is there a way to find out how many times the shutter has been fired on a Nikon N90s?</p>

<p>I may try to place an order for the newer Tamron 24-70mm f2.8 with the 82mm front lens. Kinda waiting to hear some reviews of actual use.</p>

<p>Thanks for the replies. I have used the Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 on both digital and film cameras and was very impressed with the quality of photos produced. The 6 year warranty that comes with the Tamron is even more impressive. I just came across a Nikon N90s that had only seen approximately 6 rolls of film through it so I was looking for a lens to put on and leave on. The Tamron seems to fit the bill, so thanks again for all the comments.</p>

<p>Has anyone ever used this lens or heard of it? I recently had the opportunity to purchase one but had never heard of it before. Has anyone used one? The one I found was for F mount Nikon's. Let me know.</p>

<p>I have a Canon EOS A5/A2e film body and want to buy a new lens to fit this body. I have been looking at prime lenses from 3rd party vendors like Tokina and Tamron. My question is this: Will a Tokina 35mm f2.8 Pro DX Macro Lens or a Tokina 100mm f2.8 Pro D Macro Lens work in autofocus mode when placed on a Canon EOS A5/A2e Body?</p>

<p>Thanks for all the respones to this question. It has helped me to factor out a lot of mumbo jumbo, and work on taking better photographs. This all began in a photography class and I can see it only matters to a few people, none of which I know. I will be out this weekend working on manipulating light in a light tight box. Thanks again.</p>

<p>The quality in the photo can be affected, I guess, by other variables. Both of these lenses come from the older point and shoot cameras of the 80's. The first one with 4 elements in 3 groups is from an Olympus Stylus Epic and the second one is from a Nikon L35AF. Both take good pictures, I just wanted to know if the difference in design could either negatively or positively affect the outcome in the end.</p>

<p>I have 2 cameras that use the same lens, yet internally are very different. Can anyone explain if the difference in design will result in a difference in optical quality (better pictures)?<br>

One is a 35mm f2.8 four (4) elements in three (3) groups and the other<br>

is a 35mm f2.8 five (5) elements in four (4) groups.<br>

Will this difference in design effect the overall quality of the photo? In other words taking a photo of the same object with each camera either will show a difference or both will reveal the same details of the same object in a photo.</p>

 

<p>Would using a "Moose Filter" with Black and White film improve or impede tonal quality? I will be shooting film outdoors at different times like early morning, midafternoon, and early sunset. I have seen the difference using color film, and wonder if the same effects will happen with blacck and white film.</p>

<p>Sometimes I am genuinely surprised at the color quality of expired film. Kinda makes ya wonder who's fooling who. By the way that is a great photo.</p>

<p>Has anyone ever used AGFA color negative film in iso 100, 400 or 800? Is it worth checking out?</p>

<p>I am looking for a 35mm color film that I can use consistently and wonder if ISO 100 is too limited. Maybe I should look for something like ISO 400 instead. What would happen if I used an ISO 100 film in low light with or without flash?</p>

<p>I recently ran into some Kodak Gold 100 35mm film that had a expiration date of 02/2011. Is this really Kodak produced film? And what is meant by "grey" market film?</p>

<p>So would 50 rolls of 400x36 = $75. a good deal?</p>

<p>Is this a good film for using when travelling? I am looking for a decent consumer grade color film to take to Europe. I only want to take 1 all around ISO speed for indoor/outdoor photos. Has anyone used this or do you have any suggestions for another film choice?</p>

<p>So if I am outdoors shooting Fuji Reala iso 100 speed film on a bright sunny day I should overexpose 1 stop and set the camera to ISO 80?</p>

 

<p>I am using a Nikon N90s camera and wonder do I need to overexpose color negative film to improve overall texture and sharpness? For instance setting the ISO at 200 when shooting ISO 400 speed film. And what happens when I set ISO 400 speed film to 800 or 1600? Can anyone help me out on this.</p>

 

<h1>Or would the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 EX DC HSM AutoFocus Standard Lens be a better choice for the uses I have mentioned?</h1>

<p>I remain to shoot film as my primary medium, and now want a fast wide lens to use on a Nikon N90s Body. The two lens' I am considering are the <strong>Sigma 24mm f/1.8 EX DG Aspherical Macro Lens and the Nikon AF 24mm F2.8. </strong>My question is will this Sigma lens work on the older Nikon N90s body? Or should I stick with getting the Nikon 24mm F2.8? I will be using them for indoor photography, including group photos, and outdoor landscape photography. The Sigma use will mostly be used in low light settings indoors and out. I am looking for something wider than the Nikon 50mm f1.8 that I have been using, so my big question will this lens work on an older Nikon film camera?</p>

<p>First I want to thank all the people who contributed a response to this question. I have gained some valuable insight of the equipment I now use and a more positive perspective of the people who make photography enlightening and fun and who respond to photo.net forums. I believe most of my problems come from operator error, which is why I post questions to others who travel down the same roads I do. For example I have been trying to set FEC on the flash not mounted to the camera and only some basic choices are available. Then I accidentally mounted the flash on the camera and walla all kinds of commands appeared that I had NEVER EVER seen from my trusty little Nikon SB-24. So as you can see I am no where near semi, semi-pro yet I truly enjoy capturing moments in time. For what I do my 2 Nikon N90s cameras, a Nikon n8008s, a Nikon SB-24, SB-23, and SB-20 are all I need for the next 10 years. Now its all about improving my creativeness and using the tools I have to do the best I can do one photo at a time. I honestly have picked up more usable info on this site than anywhere else. Thanks again for your time and patience. </p>