phil_mark

<p>These are Honeywell reels and tanks and they pop up on ebay every so often. A friend of mine just sold a lot of them, 120 and 35mm reels and tanks. They are about 1.5" wider than a standard nikkor reel and they are very easy to load. I believe my friend still has a few reels and a tank left.</p>

<p>PH</p>

<p>FOMA R will not process as a negative. It will only reverse process. It is a B&W positive cine film.</p>

<p>www.dr5.com is the only place in the Us that can process the film, other than trying to do it your self.</p>

<p>PH</p>

<p>RP:<br>

Explain how you can figure using a less than stellar service and process is better?<br>

The scala film is 13$ and all the other B&W films are 3-5$. While the dr5 process is higher, the film+ process is more with the other lab.<br>

You must have some sort of good karma going! I haven't had anything good come out of that place in California. Even if its just a smidgen more, my bets are on the lab in Denver.<br>

To each his own :)</p>

<p>P.Hall</p>

<p>Hello;<br>

It has been a while since I posted here. I use the dr5 service because I am local to the lab [lucky me].<br>

You all might want to listen to this;<br>

http://www.insideanalogphoto.com/inside-analog-photo-radio-dr5-chrome-lab/120<br>

If you do some research you will find dr5 is the best choice for processing the scala film, what is left of it.<br>

But why even use it is how i see it. I used to send scala film to other labs with less than satisfactory results.</p>

<p>P.Hall</p>

one of very few custom shops;

www.blackandwhitenegative.com

P.Hall

I would disagree fully with all the replies in this thread.

Transparencies are 10 times easier to scan, be they B&W or E6.

Check out dr5.com . There you will find much info on B&W processing, negs or positives.

PHALL

www.imagearchive.com

What you need is an interpositive.

If you wish to save old film images this would be the best option.

It requires exposing your old film negs onto B&W film that will be positive processed.

You could also High-res scan the images and output them through an LVT film recorder. The result would be loss-less.

PHall

Here in Denver we use a custom B&W lab, negs and B&W slides, dr5.com

They only do film processing and contacts.

P.Hall

Bob:

HP5 @800-1600 via dr5.com

The best film and process at this speed, no question.

Regards

P.Hall

Robert;

it's a travesty you call this film TECH PAN. It is not TP by any stretch. It does however have some TP Qualities, and I would promote it on its own merits. Our 1st tests have been very good. Kodak can be Quite nasty when it comes to trade name disputes BTW.

It is important to express that this is NOT copex or microfilm. It is a good replacement for TP.

I find it also disturbing that photonet allows other companies to post business links and not others. This is a terrible double standard.

Robert;

it's a travesty you call this film TECH PAN. It is not TP by any stretch. It does however have some TP Qualities, and I would promote it on its own merits. Our 1st tests have been very good. Kodak can be Quite nasty when it comes to trade name disputes BTW.

It is important to express that this is NOT copex or microfilm. It is a good replacement for TP.

I find it also disturbing that photonet allows other companies to post business links and not others. This is a terrible double standard.

There will be a page dedicated to this film on my website, which I wont mention because the photonet god will have a fit. Public venues should be equal to all.

[posted on an assistants log in]