Jump to content

biomed

PhotoNet Pro
  • Posts

    1,289
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by biomed

  1. I would recommend taking along a hiking pole that has a tripod mount on the head. I believe Leki makes one. This will allow you to use the pole for hiking and photography. For a camera I would consider taking along a point and shoot with a wide angle lens that shoots in RAW. I have a Canon S70 that has a 28-100mm equivalent lens that is a terrific camera. Even though the S70 has been discontinued you may be able to buy a used one or get one of the more recent cameras that have a wide angle lens. This combination should serve you well both in terms of camera and weight. All the best on your long hike.

     

    MM

  2. Thanks Richard. I agree the ring flashes are expensive so I'll look into using a couple of off-camera flashes. By the way, those are some incredible macro shots. Are you using extension tubes or bellows with your macro lens?

     

    Thanks.

    MM

  3. Does anyone know which of the macro flash units, Konica Minolta/Sony/third

    party, will allow me to stop down to at least f/16 when used with my Tamron 90

    mm f/2.8 macro lens (the film version lens) on my Sony A-100? I own a Vivitar

    macro flash unit that I previously used on my Maxxum 9xi but which only allows

    me to stop down to f/8. So I'm looking for something to get me more depth of field.

    Thanks.

     

    MM

  4. I would like to create a slideshow to be viewed on a widescreen TV. To what

    height and width dimensions, in pixels, should I save my images so that they

    look their best on the widescreen TV? I will be buring the images onto a DVD

    to be played on a DVD player. Could I use the same DVD to view the slideshow

    on a 4:3 TV with the only difference being that there will be black bars at

    the top and bottom of the image, or do I have to burn a different DVD with new

    height and width sizes for each image?

     

    Thanks.

    MM

  5. I'm now leaning towards the Nikon Coolscan V because of its better build-quality. I have about a thousand slides that I will scan and more later as I continue to shoot slide films. Seems like the scans from both the Nikon V and Minolta 5400 II are about the same. One more question: Is the quality of a scan from the Coolscan 5000 much better than the Coolscan V and is the $500 difference worth considering the Coolscan 5000?

     

    Thanks.

    M. Mehtar

  6. I'm in the process of purchasing a film scanner to be used primarily

    on 35mm slides. I have a few kodachromes but mostly will scan

    ektachromes. I am thinking of getting either the Minolta 5400 II or

    Nikon V. Since I will be scanning slides, some with dark shadows, I

    was wondering how important multi-pass scanning is to bring out

    shadow details? The Minolta has multi-pass but the Nikon V does not.

    I'd appreciate the comments from users of these scanners and their

    ability to bring out shadow details. Thanks in advance.

     

    M. Mehtar

  7. If you're looking for a wide angle digicam then this is among the best. Its 35mm equivalent is 28-100mm.

     

    I've had mine for about a week and so far:

    Good: excellent image quality; easy to use; full manual control (but not as functional as a digital slr); great for lanscapes because of the 28mm wide end; saves in RAW format.

    Bad: electronic viewfinder is difficult to see sometimes; optical viewfinder only shows 80% of image; slight distortion at the 28mm end; only goes up to 100mm (important if you want a longer telephoto end).

     

    You might also want to consider the s60 which is a 5MP camera with the same features as the s70 and could be bought for about a hundred dollars less. There isn't that much difference in quality of the images from these two cameras. Might be a better option since you're looking for a backup.

  8. I can buy a used Coolscan 4000 for the same price as a Coolscan V.

    I've read that these are basically the same scanner with the 4000

    being able to do multisampling and batch scanning. I will be

    scanning slides and was wondering which of these two scanners would

    be better for me. I won't really need to do any batch scanning (the

    batch feeder is also expensive). Has anyone done a side by side test

    of these two scanners? All opinions would be appreciated.

     

    Thanks.

    MM

  9. I'm interested in getting a macro flash unit for use on a 9xi and

    600si cameras. What is the difference between the 1200 AF and 1200 AF

    (N) units and will either work on my cameras without the controller.

     

    Thanks.

    MM

  10. I have a 5200i flash with an OC cable and would like to mount the

    flash on a bracket that uses a tripod socket. Is there an adapter

    available for this from Minolta or another manufacturer? I've been

    to my local photo stores here in Central Connecticut and no one has

    anything for my flash. The standard adapters fit other makes but not

    Minolta. If someone can direct me on this I'd appreciate it very

    much.

     

    Thanks.

    MM

  11. I too am interested in getting the Epson 1640 Photo scanner and was wondering how good it is in handling 6X6 and 6X7 slides. I'm looking at getting a scanner that scans 6X6 and 6X7 good enough for printing 8X10s and also 35mm slides for printing 8X10s as well. Due to a limited budget I can only afford a scanner under $500. I'd appreciate any advice.

     

    Thanks.

  12. I own a Pentax 6x7 camera and would like to buy a flash for it. What are people's experiences with the one's they are using and which would they recommend? I also own a Yashicamat 124G and would like to be able to use the flash on that camera too. Your experiences/recommendations would be greatly appreciated.
×
×
  • Create New...