Jump to content

jay_lang

Members
  • Posts

    46
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jay_lang

  1. You won't be dissapointed with either camera. For macro work the 40D is probably better due to the crop. The 5D will produce better image quality. If money is no option I would probably choose the 5D though, unless you really need a fast fps speed.
  2. Not sure about the lens as I only really use primes, but the 40D is excellent. I personally have one and am very pleased. I upgraded it from a 400D. The feel (size) and build quality is so much better. The fps are excellent and the AF is much better too.

     

    Image quality is about the same and I wuldn't worry about the difference between 10.1mp and 12mp. The old 30D was only 8.1mp and took better images than the 400D. Its the lens thats most important.

     

    I'd go with the 40D over the XSI any day.

  3. Hi

     

    Would anyone know the law in relation to selling street shots as fine art

    prints? I'm thinking about the shots which include people, where their faces are

    visible. Especially ones where the person is the main focus of the photo.

     

    I'm based in the UK.

  4. Hi

     

    Well the 135L is a superb lens. The 70-200 covers the same range so maybe not needed. The plus point though, the 135 is alot lighter and smaller than the 70-200 . Also, if you shoot in the street it brings less attention due to its size.

     

    I use it as i really prefer primes over zooms, but thats personal choice.

     

    IQ wise, i doubt if there is any difference. The 70-200 is after all one of the best lenses canon make.

     

    What is the main use you have in mind for it?

  5. Hi

     

    I have the Gitzo GT3541LS tripod and am considering a lateral arm for it. Will

    hold a Canon 40D with a Canon 100mm Macro lens and ring flash.

     

    Does anyone know what the best lateral arm would be for this? The head is a Kirk

    BH-1 ball head.

     

    There seems to be 3 models from Gitzo but not sure if they all fit the tripod or

    not?

     

    Cheers

     

    Jake

  6. I have the 40d (upgraded from a 400d). Its an awesome camera and a much better fit if you have bigger hands. i guess it all comes down to budget really. The 70-200m f2.8 will be better for indoors low light, but is a pricey lens. Maybe get the 40d and a cheaper prime lens such as the 40mm f1.4 or the 135mm f2.0
  7. Well the 85mm you have is just an awesome lens. The 50mm f1.4 is good and great value. If you want L series build quality then the 50mm f1.2 is great but expensive.

     

    I use the 135mm f2 L alot and that a very sharp lens and great value for an L.

  8. So who would upgrade from the 400d to the 40d? More rugged build, will fit

    better in a bigger hand, same sensor but with digic III and improved noise

    levels at higher ISO's(apparently), 6.5 fps and partial weather sealing.

     

    What are peoples reasons for or against?

     

    Personally I have pre-ordered a 40d mainly for the more rugged build quality. I

    like the 400d and it has been a great introduction to the world of DSLR. The

    40d is my next step as the 5D is out of my price range for now as a body. I

    have been focusing on buying good quality lenses instead and have a few decent

    ones now.

  9. Never underestimate the power of sony's marketing machine. Thats one wealthy company with a very very good advertising team.

     

    still, canon and nikon have the best reputation. there will always be the old who is better question. i'm a canon man myself but i think maybe nikon win. they say canon makes the best camera, nikon the best lenses.

     

    i go with the camp that says the lens makes the big difference. a crap lens on a good camera = crap shots and vice versa, so nikon seems to win in the long run.

     

    still, the difference is probably minimal and i do love the canon kit.

×
×
  • Create New...