Jump to content

valery_yakushev1

Members
  • Posts

    62
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by valery_yakushev1

  1. Many thanx everyone for help! I found a very useful advice from Ronald Moravec - to divide stock D76 into several bottles and use one for each developing session. The confirmation that one-shot is the way to go was also very useful to me.

     

    I did Rodinal-only development for 5 years, then I discovered D76 which is more to my liking. :-) I still use Rodinal when I'm lazy.

     

    I recently bought chemicals and will experiment with developers. I already did experiment with two baths developer, sort of Ansel Adams formula (7,5 g metol per 1 litre) but the result was very uneven - some shots were excellent, some awful. All negs came out with high density, though - maybe I made some mistake because people say the negs from two-bath developers should be thin. I cannot buy Diafine in Moscow, but I discovered a formula for home-made Diafine (I need to buy Phenidone to make it). I also found an interesting one-bath developer formula with Phenidone in a book written by Eric Einhorn (spelling?).

     

    My question was solely about keeping stock D76, nothing else.

     

    Erik Hattrem, a pack of Kodak D76 cost more than $3 in Moscow, and I usually use it to develop 1 film, which is a waste of resources, I guess. It's not only the cost of powder, but labor and time as well.

  2. I develop appox. one-two 35mm roll of film per month.

     

    If I'll dilute the powder of Kodak D76 in 1 liter distilled water, and after

    development of one film I'll keep the solution in tight 1 liter bottle, how long

    can I keep to develop more films?

     

    I normally throw away the developer, using it as one shot, because I was

    thinking I'd need a replentisher if I want to use it again. After some reading

    on internet I see that people keep it and develop more films. My ultimate goal

    is to develop 4-5 films with one 1 liter concentrate without using replentisher

    -- is it o.k., or I shall correct development times each time for a next film?

    or it is better to continue my practice to use it as one-shot developer, as

    previously?

     

    Another important question - should I keep D76 solution in the fridge or it is

    o.k. in dark place under normal room temperature?

     

    I understand that 1:1 and higher dilutions of D76 cannot be stored.

     

    Many thanx for your help!

  3. I recently bought M3 and Summilux 50 (last pre-ASPH version), all is chrome, quite heavy but beautiful. The lens arrived only 3 days ago and I now have my first film in the camera (Tri-X), need to finish it and develop to see what it is.

     

    Me too, I am a Contax G2 user for the last 8 years (45,28 and 90). Shooting with M3 is a way different from Contax G, although both are 'rangefinders'. It's much easier with Contax G but more fun with M3. The viewfinder of M3 is fascinating. I have no plans to sell Contax G, it is also a nice camera and lenses are superb.

  4. nice shots, Luigi!, I like No. 1 in particular

     

    In No.3 you have a rather strong reticulation, intentional or not, I can only guess, but I do not think it makes a very nice bokeh... In any way, the subject in focus is immune to retuculation.

     

    The lens arrived to Patrick on Friday, many thanx indeed!

  5. To Ronald Moravec --

     

    Ronald, could you share your recipe for your own D76 soup, if possible, or a link to the place where it's described. I have old Russian photography books with recepies for developers, but none gives D76 (probaly, for patent infringement reasons). Many thanx in advance!

  6. Many thanx, Carl and Rob!

     

    I meant 'front retaining ring' when I wrote 'dial'. I just didn't know how to call it correctly.

     

    I will watch out for ASPH on the lens and check Leica item numbers on the boxes.

     

    I am not yet sure do I want ASPH or 3rd generation of Summilux 50 (pre-ASPH), with 0.7m focusing and telescopic hood, I will think about it for a while, reading and watching scans on the net (not able to make a test of two lenses to decide by myself). Anyway, it is very useful to know which is which. Thanx again!

  7. I wonder if there is a rule that ASPH is marked on the dial on the lens? I

    recently saw at eBay a black 50 Summilux M ASPH with ASPH on the dial, but I

    held in my hands a brand new silver chrome Summilux M 50, also ASPH according to

    the Leica dealer but I do not remember that ASPH was engraved on the dial?

     

    Could anyone comment, please? Thanks!

  8. Well, I do not own a Leica M yet (although I bought an M3 about one month ago, but yet I will receive it either later on in August or in early autumn).

     

    I have a Contax G2 with 3 lenses for 8 years now and plenty of excellent photographs to show, but I would love to see the shots on this forum made with Leica glass only, or at least, non-Leica glass with Leica camera -- that's why I do not wish to post any photo made by myself with excellent Zeiss G glass.

     

    I fully understand the feelings of this members' forum who are irritated by the shots totally irrelevant to Leica. I think that any shots made by 35-mm rangefinder camera must be posted elsewhere, not here. They have a rangefinder forum, anyway.

     

    I realise that this kind of 'outcries' took place many times before with no effect....

×
×
  • Create New...