waldemar_giers___kitchener
-
Posts
162 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by waldemar_giers___kitchener
-
-
-
-
-
-
<p>Hello Akira,<br>
Interesting but not chip at all. Thanx for the link. Not much to read for me but pictures tell a lot(great models by the way).</p>
-
-
-
-
<p >I hear you Akira. Yes we can always go back to old faithful film. On the bright side - Nikon sold truckloads of D40, D40X, D200, and D70. Anyone interested in UV spectrum of photography will have ample selection of CCD based machines to chose from. And we still don't know what we will get in the future?? Did you see Vivek's UV1? Neat. It may be another small breakthrough in approach to UV photography.<br>
Picture bellow – taken 2 hr ago. I just modified old Enna Lithagon 28mm to Nikon mount. This is first try in UV. It appears very promising. (about 1 stop bellow UV nikkor transmit ion), good contrast and sharpness.</p><div></div>
-
<p>Akira,</p>
<p > I've got mine D40 just for UV that time when you discovered it is very UV useful without modification. (Akira has all the bragging rights) Sure thing is sad to see it go but after so long run of 6MP sensor we kind of expected it. Just matter of time. I still use it and hope it will last me for a long time.</p><div></div>
-
-
<p > Great photography everyone. It's real pleasure to open WedNEsDAy tread every week.</p>
<p >Lil, I hope you will get well very soon. Your woodpecker is great. One busy body. I'm sure he's got the drift of economy and just in case stacking on nuts. Sure thing you didn't loose your touch and you'll be back on right track in no time.</p>
<p >Once again, great work everyone.</p>
-
-
<p>Mine 17-35 f2.8 AFS squeaks for years now. I don't know if it is same kind of squeak tho. Many of them do as a matter of fact. Never heard it led to permanent breakdown. I'll use mine and will see what happen. Yours is still under warranty. You have option to have it checked by Nikon.</p>
-
-
-
-
<p>Bjorn knows what he's saying. Besides obvious quality of Coastal Optics 60mm lens lays financial part of it. At almost $5000 someone need to ask yourself question - Is masculine improvement in quality worth it? Especially if he plans to use it as regular glass, not multispectrum tool. Some of Zeiss offering may work as good at fraction of final price.</p><div></div>
-
-
<p>Another winter storm!!!!</p>
-
-
-
-
Nikon WedNEsDAy PiC #18
in Nikon
Posted
<p>Thaks a lot for kind words.</p>
<p >Kiron/Lester A Dine is really superb 105mm f2.8 lens. I have it for 2 years already. Since I've bought it I stopped to use 105mm Nikkors and finally sold them this spring. In my books beats Nikkors. (I did not try latest VR model). If you have opportunity to buy it at decent price - do it. They are more expensive then few years back. I've got mine in the dental set with Nikon 2002 and ring flash.</p>
<p >I have all arsenal macro lenses but this one most often brings most consistent results. My other favorite is Nikkor Zoom 70-180mm. Superb lens. This lens is the reason I resist to buy 200mm Micro f4.0. But NAS never sleeps!!!<br>
Once again great tread everyone. Every week I wait for it. Great pics everybody.</p>