Jump to content

andrew_clark1

Members
  • Posts

    43
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by andrew_clark1

  1. <p>I rented an M6. Didn't like it because it was not my auto focus, super quick SLR. Then I got my images back and that had me sold. Eventually got an M3. Moved on to an M4 years ago and have not owned a SLR in years.</p>
  2. Does anyone have the address of what used to be this site?:

    members.aol.com/dcolucci/

     

    He had a very thorough history of both Leica and Rolleiflex equipment, along with other medium format camera

    manufacturers. Recently, when I went to his site, it was redirected to a new domain. Of course, I should have

    taken note of the new address and bookmarked it, but I didn't and now AOL has discontinued their hosting. So, the

    redirect is gone and Google or Yahoo hasn't indexed it yet.

     

    Thanks

  3. Does anyone have the address of what used to be this site?:

    members.aol.com/dcolucci/

     

    He had a very thorough history of both Leica and Rolleiflex equipment, along with other medium format camera

    manufacturers. Recently, when I went to his site, it was redirected to a new domain. Of course, I should have

    taken note of the new address and bookmarked it, but I didn't and now AOL has discontinued their hosting. So, the

    redirect is gone and Google or Yahoo hasn't indexed it yet.

     

    Thanks

  4. I'm with Craig Cooper in his response, except I changed it slightly:

     

    Still shooting film with no interest in shooting digital, although I do scan everything. With an M4 and VC Meter II, I prefer to shoot Tri-X and Ilford HP5, FP4, and PanF+. As others have mentioned, lenses are superb, and the overall size of the package is small. I shoot 99% B&W and I'm convinced digital capture is still an eternity away from delivering the tonality of traditional B&W films. I also don't want to spend hours, trying to make digital images look like my preferred film stocks. And my Leica will not be obsolete in 2 years, unlike most digital SLR cameras.

  5. About 9 months ago, I was looking through the completed auctions on eBay. I saw a closed auction for a Leica M4 black pain bodyt, which was heavily worn (brassed.) The owner obviously didn't know what they had in their possession when they listed as an "old, worn Leica camera that could use some work." Someone has used the 'Buy It Now' option for $350.
  6. I've seen plenty examples of black paint Leica M3/M2 that have a lot of brassing, but has anyone seen examples of

    chrome versions with a lot of brassing. It must take a substantial amount of time and use for this extent of wear

    to happen.

  7. Congrats Frank. But, you didn't mention which lens it has. Is it a Planar or Xenotar.

     

    I also have a 3.5F with the Xenotar and it is amazing how sharp it is. I got mine from a camera shop, where they did not know the condition of the camera because it sat on a storage room shelf of a photography store for the better part of 40 years. It turns out there it was in excellent condition, except for a minor dent in the hood. It only needed a CLA and I had a brighter screen put in. It came with the original box, receipt, paper work, and a coupon for a free roll of film from Rolleiflex. It also came with a case, the hood, and a strap. Mine is a 1958 model.

  8. I need the same for my FM and I have contacted Essex. In the mean time I found an eBay auction, offering a CLA

    for $80. He's an ex technician from Professional Camera Repair Service of New York. I might go this route. He has

    a lot of positive feedback on his CLA service.

     

    Auction is 270280629037

×
×
  • Create New...