Jump to content

aurelien_le_duc

Members
  • Posts

    279
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by aurelien_le_duc

  1. I agree with you: start with FP4, developped in a known developer. Depends on what you want... no grain at all? perceptol, but you will loose a little "acutance". You want "acutance"? Use Rodinal (as far as I am concerned, I love this couple Rodinal+FP4: grain is so beautiful. My last experiment is PMK, and I love it too, because grain is very little, and PMK make highlights easier to enlarge.
  2. For portraits, all fine grain films are good options. But there is a difference between old fashioned films like FP4+/PlusX and modern grain films like delta or T max. Personally, I prefer old fashioned one, and Plus X with its round fine grain is very very beautiful in portraits. But a little hard to find.
  3. I am working with Mamiya 7. No back. You have to load the film each time, and 220 film is very useful, to have 20 pics. Changing the film every 10 pics is really a problem. I would like Ilford reintroduce 220 film, but as far as I know, they won't.
  4. Hi,

     

    I asked Kodak recently, and this is their answer about PXP 220:

    "I am sorry to say that Kodak Professional Plus-X 220 is no longer being

    made, but we do continue to make Kodak Professional Tri-X Film in 220,

    catalog #828-6825.

     

    If you should have additional questions, please be sure to revisit our

    site as we are continually adding information to enhance our support. "

  5. If I could I would advice to use Perceptol with FP4 and ID11 with HP5. These developpers are particularly adapted to these films and deliver very thin grain. I think microphen is not really adapted to FP4. Microphen is more developped to fit with sensitive films like HP5 or delta 400 and 3200.

     

    Friendly,

     

    Aurelien

×
×
  • Create New...