kivivuori

<p>In my opinion Kodak Retina IIIC has much better viewfinder. <br /><br />Br<br /><br />Esa Kivivuori<br />Finland</p><div></div>

<p>Hi again,<br /><br />Some of my Rolleiflex pics can also be seen here:<br /><br />https://www.flickr.com/photos/esakivivuori/with/5568618629/<br /><br /><br> (Rolleiflex 2.8F, Fujichrome Provia 100F) From up to bottom:<br /><br />- Sakasti Tapiolan kirkko www<br />- 06 Tapiola church<br />- 05 Tapiola church<br />- 04 Tapiola church<br />- 03 Tapiola church<br />- 02 Tapiola church<br /><br />BR <br /><br />Esa</p> <p> </p><div></div>

<p>Hi<br /><br />After 40+ years and seven Rolleiflex-cameras I think Rolleiflex 3.5F and 2.8F were the best ones I´v had.<br /><br />BR<br /><br />Esa Kivivuori ARPS<br /> Finland</p>

<p>Hi,<br /><br />Based on the photo of your negative strip I believe that your Tri-X is simply underexposed at least 2 f-stops. It`s extremyly difficult to scan even some details from that kind of negatives unless you are working with high end scanners such as Imagon or drum scanners. <br /><br />BR<br /><br />Esa Kivivuori ARPS<br />Finland</p>

<p>Few weeks ago I sold my DeVere 203 6"x 9" enlarger with two lamphouses (Cathomag cold cathode lamphouse & Varicon lamphouse with two condenser lenses). It was and is a nice, well built and heavy machine. <br /><br />I needed a slightly smaller one and found a mint Durst M670 diffuser enlarger with colour head. It is not a true professional machine, but it works fine and since 99% of my b&W negatives are 35mm....6x6/6x7, it is large enough for me. It is also easy to transform as a copy stand.<br /><br />BR<br /><br />Esa Kivivuori<br />Finland</p><div></div>

<p>M4 + 2/35 Summicron IV or asph. <br /><br />2nd hand M4 was my first M-camera in 1972 and after that I´ve had 6 other models. After all those I still prefer M4.<br /><br />Esa Kivivuori<br />Finland</p>

<p><img src=" alt="" />I liked very much my M3 DS with Elmar 50 mm f/2.8, but after having 7 M-Leicas during 40 years my vote still goes to original M4 with Summicron 2/35 mm (IV) or asph.<br /><br /><br /></p><div></div>

<p>My vote goes to 2/50 AI. (I also have Nikkor 2/50 H, H.C and 1.4/50 S-Auto)<br /><br />BR<br /><br />Esa Kivivuori<br> Finland</p>