mario2

Sin duda esta fuera de foco,me gustaria comentarte la imagen:

Para este tipo de fotografia necesitas cerrar bastante mas el diafracma, tendras mas profundidad de campo (DOF),prueba y ya veras... si te hace falta un tripode porque no hay suficiente luz no lo dudes utilizalo. Un saludo

If you can, send me the raw file by mail, and I'll try to look for a technical solution to see better and I explain how I made it...Greetings

Hola Saul! hoy he leido tu critica constructiva entorno a mi imagen,antes de todo te agradezco tu postura franca ante mi imagen ya que yo miro de comentar lo mas objetivamente,y sino para que comentamos y criticamos imagenes, con una critica adecuada y sincera se aprende...Ense?ar mira que imagen tan bonita no tiene ning?n sentido con gente que tiene un cierto nivel en fotografia,estamos obligados a llegar un poquito mas lejos...Como a mi me gusta ser claro te dire una cosa, tienes parte de razon en tu critica,has sabido observar como fotografo,pero el problema que veo en general es que ha menudo,nos falta informaci?n para poder opinar objetivamente.Hay algo que se llama tecnica y eso si que no se puede rebatir, si una imagen esta tecnicamente mal resuelta esta mal y punto,mi imagen tecnicamente esta mal porque cae... si se?or! Paso a explicar el porque la imagen es asi:

1) Es cierto que el encuadre cae, es evidente!, pero una imagen captada a mano alzada en el eje vertical con 2.5kg en las manos, como puedes imaginar es dificil de realizar,haberla hecho con tripode! si se?or...., podia haber optado por recortar-la via software pero como bien sabras eso no es lo mismo, mucha gente recorta imagenes como tal cosa como si no pasara nada.No se dan cuenta que nada tiene que ver,la lectura que se le pueda dar a una imagen es totalmente diferente.

2) Como la luz era cenital la parte oculta de la gargola tenia muy poco detalle, la diferencia luminica era bastante grande,salvar el detalle de la gargola o aplacar el excesivo contraste.Via software decidi salvar la parte oculta, pero matando quizas demasia el contraste, la medicion ahora recuerdo que fue matricial, y no central o puntual dado que fue realizada en pos. 200mm,?ese fue el error!.A mi logicamente el angulo de la imagen me gusta ,pero tengo que reconocer que... hay que volver ha hacerla.Gracias por tu sinceridad y recibe un cordial saludo.

I like the frame and the tone, is a nice photo!I would like suggest you,to put the vertical photos with a max.size at 600 pix,because don't see enterely, we must be thing,as if the photo has been an exhibition room; to have a clear idea about the photo and interpret correctly.Greeetings

A wonderfull capture with a magic light...yes! looks like a postcard

bonita imagen, bien resuelta y extremadamente saturada,la importancia que le das al cielo la veo muy correcta; el cielo es el que da plasticidad a la imagen con esas nubes tan potentes. Un cordial saludo

Good composition I like the frame,has a satured color, a litle bit like Kodacrome.Greetings

I like the tones and the contrast, the definition is very well, the DOF IS OK. Greeetings

Beautiful and very original image, and good frame;the frame give us a certainly surrealist...

Nice shoot! I like the frame,in my imho, maybe better with a litle bit contrast. Greetings

Good Monning! I would like to give you some suggestions about a digital world...

You shoot with Nikon, the same than me, the only way to give the absolute control in digital is:

1) Shoot always in raw (nef), don't forget this format is, the only one that has the complete information about the capture, is the equivalent to the film or slide.

2) Manage your photos with some software that can change parameters like this: D-LIGHTING ?only adjust the medium tones?, (works very well in advanced mode if you would like to show details in a dark areas keeping the details in a high lights)

WHITE BALANCE, EV- CONTROL are some other tools.

3) The perfect program doesn't exist, any software has good things and bad things, but I have Nikon capture and works properly (in my imho).

5) If you have changed some of this parameters you can observe that if you move directly the curves in some channel or channel RGB mode, the histogram lacks some tones(and becomes quite aggressive for the whole process ; You had better move the ev.compensation or d-lighting at the beginning of the process ,remember that moving the curves is the last and the less recommended solution

4) if you want to copy some of your best photos to big size 15??x 20?? or more, and don't loose any tone, convert to tiff 16 bits and bring to the photo lab.

5)If you convert the Raw file in Jpg whenever you change anything and save it, the file looses information every time that you save, and lost a continuous quality, therefore is important to manipulate the RAW. The Nikon Capture program give us the possibility to save as a Raw .

My sequence is this one: photo MLE 001.NEF if necessary to modify some things, I rename as MLE 001 mod.NEF, if you open this file appear the tings that you mod. And later on save it as TIFF.16 or 8 bits.

6) The Photoshop gives a wide range of software possibilities , such as solving the problems related about the marks produced by the dust on the sensor when changing the lens .I recommend you to buy a Photoshop book according to your level, there are a many them. Sorry for my huge explanation.Greetings

Bonita imagen de la sabina con un encuadre muy cuidado.Los verdes me recuerdan un poco a los de fujicrome velvia. Como siempre cuidando hasta el mas minimo detalle. Un cordial saludo.

I like the reflection,a litle bit dark... maybe with some bright will be better + 0.7 ev aprox not?

I like... with a little bit things,this photo is an aesthetic photo,with a perfect light and a good mesuration of the light.Is only an opinion, when clipping a photo by software to modify the original frame after the capture, we don't give the same information, is similar to re-make that photo.That image was processed in your brain differently than in front of the computer. In my opinion the aesthetic and originanity in some cases go together, and if we change the frame we will change probably the originality and the aesthetic.. Greetings

All looks like perfect,I like the sensation that cause look this image, simply solitude,the color fantastic and the contrast amazing. I don't have any doubt 7/7.Greetings

I like the composition,frame.Maybe the color a litle bit unreal...was your intention?

I like the light and the composition,I thing that needs more DOF about drops.Greetings

Bella imagen, con un bonito encuadre y con el tono de color justo, no excesivamente saturado, aunque personalmente yo hubiera cerrado un poco mas el diafragma, dando el punto de enfoque que le falta a la hoja delantera y a los petalos de la flor. Un cordial saludo

Beautiful image,good frame and a litle bit smooth, with a enough light for not burn the hight lights and keep the details well.Greetings

Magnificos tonos pastel! esta simple, pero bella imagen me inspira tranquilidad, supongo que algo afí® con la realidad del momento.Un saludo

Well done!I always like this type of photos with a low exposure time, and the moss coovering the rocks, the water looks like a litle bit magic.Greetings

Dificil toma como siempre son las nocturnas... mantener el detalle que se pueda en las zonas mas oscuras,sin llegar a quemar las altas luces.Un saludo Saul

For me has a lot of aesthetic, the color looks like beautiful, but a litle bit satured.When we use the flash in landscapes gives us a certainly degree of artificial light... I kwow, but in some circustancies the re-fill with flash is necessary to keep the detail on the dark areas,in this case is good because the sun leave this area with a poor light. the flower in the bottom gives certainly point of dramatization.Well done!Greetings

Hace poco tiempo que te he encontrado,aunque yo no me dedico a la fotografia de animales por su proximidad a la naturaleza me gusta mucho.Imagen preciosa,un saludo

Beautiful shoot with a perfect light,the frame is very well done!