martin_martinez

Go for the 17-40, its an amazing lens.

why dont you return it and get the D50 or D70(s) much more bang for the buck.

N75 is one of the newer models(not really) so they dont mention it.

Im kind of fond of my greens, but I can deal with not so bright greens.

the F5 is nearly indestructible, and it has a 1005 pixel rgb light meter which is just about the best in-camera meter out there. You can use all the F-mount lenses out there both AF and MF(some metering is restricted with the older lenses)

I looking for a good printer for printing bright vibrant color

images. Ill be shooting mainly nature and landscapes scanning slide

film. For now im looking for something under $200. Ive heard good

things about the Epson R200.

I guess a simple solution would be to take a hammer to it. Then simply take out your negs.

Im cant decide which lens to get, I'll be using it for landscapes

and would like to hear opinions on these two lenses from anyone who

has had experience wih both. I just want to know which delivers

higher quality and ease of use.

The main reason for me to switch has been autofocus speed and flash sync speed(outdoor fill flash). My budget is around $300. For now its seems I might wait till I can afford the F100, which has been my dream camera for a while. The main reason I was not liking the N90s was that I cant use aperture priority with G lenses.

I bought my N65 almost two years ago, and have started to outgrow

it. Im having trouble deciding whether I should get an N80 or a used

N90s. Ive seen the main specs for both and would like to hear

comparisons from those out there that have had experience with both.

My main concerns are autofocus speed, G lenses, and flash sync speed

(1/250 vs. 1/125).