m.c.fitz
-
Posts
191 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by m.c.fitz
-
-
-
-
-
-
<p>Stereo cameras were discussed (amongst other camera and photograhy subjects), on an episode of the Film Photography Podcast last winter. If you go to the website, you can hear it, and if I recall correctly, tips were giving for printing and setting up images in a frame so the stereoscopic effect could be viewed.<br>
Podcast is here: http://filmphotographyproject.com/podcast/2015/02/film-photography-podcast-119-%E2%80%93-february-15-2015<br>
More info here, at this site: http://www.seawood.com/simple-stereo-photography/</p>
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
<p>Second attempt at second picture upload:</p>
-
<p>Ooops, problem with image upload! I'll have to try again.</p>
-
<p>Ivo, those buildings are lovely. And I'm glad to see I'm not the only person who sometimes takes a picture with the camera askew. I want to print this one and frame it so the image is straight up. But I couldn't figure out how to manipulate the file to post it that way here, so if you want to see the tree standing straight, you'll have to tilt your head or your screen.</p>
-
-
<p>Thank you for posting about this. I've covered today, June 12th.</p>
-
-
<p>Tony, it was indeed cold but very beautiful, which is why I couldn't pass up the chance to expose some film. I wasn't the only photographer out, either, although I suspect I was the only one using a film camera. As for the ducks, they manage amazingly well.</p>
-
-
-
-
<p>Thank you all very much, the replies and reasons given are very helpful.<br>
When I look at the image on my screen, the fall off doesn't bother me if I look at it straight on, but moving slightly to the side changes the way it looks and doesn't seem right. As an image I like it, but I want the front part to separate neatly from the background so that it pops, which it isn't doing here, because, as has been said, the foreground blur is distracting.<br>
So back I shall go to the gardens, with fresh, rather than out of date TriX in the Rollei, and perhaps a tripod, for smaller aperture and slower shutter speeds, and keeping in mind the comments given here.<br>
I love trees and stumps: they don't change quickly, rarely move off, and don't scream "no photos! no photos!" if you point a camera at them. Their patience is wonderful.<br>
Thank you all again.</p>
-
<p>This picture was taken with a Rolleiflex 3.5 TLR, on out of date TriX. Metered at 200 asa, normal development time in Xtol, dilution 1+1.<br>
I didn't take notes of aperture or time, but it was probably wide open, and I was as close as I could get, so likely at 90cm.<br>
Being that close, and with a shallow depth of field, the front of the stump is off the plane of focus, as is the background, of course.<br>
Do you find the foreground blurring adds to or distracts from the image?<br>
I will be printing this up on fiber paper, eventually, but would appreciate some feedback. <br>
Thank you in advance for any replies.</p>
A 365 day thread
in Classic Manual Film Cameras
Posted
<p>For the 14th, since it's not been taken.</p>
<p> </p><div></div>