antonrussell
-
Posts
129 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by antonrussell
-
-
The Ricoh caplio 300G is quite unattractive if you can tolerate a shortage of megapixels (only 3.3). Otherwise, maybe the caplio GX or GX8 are supposed to be good cameras.
-
-
-
-
Obviously not a problem here in New Zealand - my own stuff is routinely printed no questions asked, except sometimes, "You <i>sure</i> you want this enlarged?"
-
I just bought a Yashica Mat 124 the day before yesterday as a first ever medium format system. This has the Yashinon f3.5 lens which according to my web research is also very good - no idea how it compares to the Lumaxar. The first roll of NPS is at the lab now. The light seals probably need replacing and some of the movements are a bit gritty, but when it's CLA'd I have high hopes for it. The lens seems imaculate. The plan is to use it with Astia/Velvia and landscapes.
-
What is the resolution of your sensor? How 'clearly' do you need to 'see' the projectiles? This will determine the reproduction ratio that you need to achieve. What is your budget? Also, what is the <i>minimum</i> working distance that your gear can provide - closer is better!<p>
Anton
-
<a href="http://www.pyramidimaging.co.uk/filmprocessing.htm">Pyramid Imaging</a>, Bread Street off Lothian Road.
-
-
-
Rob - thanks for that url! I've been waiting for this to be invented. It'll be interesting to see what people think of it.
-
With mine, the light meter diode display in the viewfinder. And a
light seal somewhere... Everything in my 'Pre- 2000' folder is ME
Super. My first SLR!
-
What the other two said - no flash, just a big white sheet as a tent, outside somewhere.
-
Look out for "6 for the price of 4" multipacks of Sensia, such as at my local camera store. Not exactly "bulk", but if you get enough...
-
-
-
-
Oops Matt squeaked in ahead of me!
-
No. Depth of field depends on focal length, aperture and magnification ratio (or distance to the subject). In practice, a smaller area of light capture medium means that to frame the same subject you would use a lower magnification ratio or a shorter focal length lens, and this is what makes the depth of field increase.
-
No, but it would also very much depend on the distance to your subject. Standing 100m away and changing from 35 to 28mm you would have to walk further to get the subject back up to the same size in the viewfinder, than if you were photographing a subject 50m away.
-
Couldn't get the URL to work Bob. I just wanted to check if that was before or after he ate the meal.
-
"How much do you think I can get for a Maxxum9 w/VC9, both in excellent shape?"</p>only about 50 bucks I'm afraid. Is a cheque in pounds stirling ok?
-
Frank G,</p>Thanks for sharing that picture. I can almost smell it.
-
Many people find 90-105 mm macros give ideal working distances with 35mm. So given the multiplier in the working distance to frame the same shot on the D70 the 60mm 2.8D might not be such a bad choice. Plus its cheaper & lighter than the 105mm and just as good quality.
Compact 35mm buying advice
in Accessories
Posted