jim_doty
-
Posts
622 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by jim_doty
-
-
A tripod is essential to much of my photography so I carry it on the plane. I take off the head, wrap both the head and tripod in clothing, and put them in my carry on suitcase. My camera backpack (with laptop) is on my back. If my checked luggage is lost, or worse, I have everything essential.
More here:
http://jimdoty.com/Travel/pack_light/pack_light.html
Jim
-
Mike,
I always manually focus the 100mm macro lens when doing macro work. I set the lens for the magnification I want. Then I focus by rocking back and forth (moving the camera closer and farther from the subject) until it looks crisp. Then I put my tripod under the camera location and tweak the focus again. As mentioned above, a focusing rail can be a big help.
High magnification magnifies any errors in technique. A tripod and/or flash plus good technique are essential. The more you do this kind of work, the better you will get.
You can increase magnification with quality, two-element closeup filters (like the 250D mentioned above), extension tubes, and high quality teleconverters. Putting a Canon EF 25mm extension tube in between the 100mm macro lens (at closest focus) and a Canon 2x teleconverter will give you about 2.5X magnification. Of course focus and everything else becomes more critical at these magnifications.
Jim
-
-
No noises with my 17-40 either. Send it back.
Jim
-
Just read your second post. Yes, get an umbrella. It is part of the package link in my prior post.
Light modifier's are just about essential. There are other light modifier's, but umbrellas are a fine way to start.
Jim
-
Jeanette,
I like Alien Bees flash units. They are well made, reasonably priced, and highly respected.
The "Beginner Bee" package is a good start.
http://alienbees.com/packages.html
After you click on the Beginner Bee package link, you can substitute the B400 unit for the B800 unit and save some money on the pachage. The B800 has more power but the B400 has enough power for most people's needs.
You can buy a second package now or later to have a two light setup.
Some photographer's get a third or even fourth light, but you can do a lot with a one or two light set.
A good basic book on portrait studio lighting is Christopher Grey's Master Lighting Guide for Portrait Photographers.
Jim
-
Carla,
The 50mm f/1.8 lens is an excellent choice for a fast, sharp, free lens. Well, not exactly free but close at $100 :) It will be very useful hand held in low light. It will also be a very fine portrait lens on the XTi (like an 80mm lens in 35mm film terms).
Since you lean toward longer focal lengths, I think the EF 28-135mm IS lens would be a great all around primary lens and a fine complement to the 50mm lens. It will be like a 44-216mm lens on a film camera. The Image Stabilization feature will be very useful in a variety of shooting situations when you don't want to use a tripod. The 28-135mm lens was my primary medium focal length zoom lens prior to getting the EF 24-105mm IS lens.
Based on your experiences with these two lenses, you can decide down the road what your third lens will be. Maybe the 70-300 IS lens if you want to go longer, or the 17-40mm or 10-22mm wide angle lens.
Enjoy!
Jim
-
Marv,
Black. No music.
I didn't mind the music but it isn't worth risking the percentage of your potential clients that won't like it. Let the photos stand on their own.
Nice photos.
Jim
-
PS Elements is very good software for the money and may serve most or all of your needs. I still use version 2 for some of my editing.
Photoshop CS/2/3 is great software, adds several features that may or may not be important to you and it is very expensive. I'm still using CS. I will probably skip CS2 and go to CS3 when it is out
By all means download Adobe Lightroom Beta and try it out for free.
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/lightroom/
Jim
-
JD
From Arizona Highways' online submission guidelines:
"In order to achieve the high-quality reproductions in our publications, we prefer large format (4x5) transparencies, especially for the large scenic landscapes that we are famous for. We will use medium format and 35mm transparencies that display exceptional quality and content. Some subjects such as wildlife and people are best suited to 35mm, but in order to achieve high-quality reproduction they must be shot on fine-grained color slide film (100 ISO or slower). NO PRINTS, NEGATIVES, DIGITAL-CAPTURE PHOTOGRAPHS, OR DUPLICATE TRANSPARENCIES WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW BY THE PHOTOGRAPHY EDITORS." (Bold print is from the source.)
Source:
http://www.arizonahighways.com/page.cfm?name=About_Submissions_Photo
Jim
-
<p>Vicky,</p>
<p>
The video that Hashim provided the link to is very helpful. Like all things Photoshop, it works very well on some images but not on all images.</p>
<p>
It would also be worthwhile to look at Bruce Fraser's book, <i>Real World Camera Raw with Adobe Photoshop</i>.</p>
<p>Jim</p>
-
Vicky,
Like other posters, I think your problem may have more to do with the flatness of the light than any inherent lack of sharpness with your lens and camera. I am assuming you use a tripod and cable release and you use the optimum apertures on your lens while still getting the depth of field that you want.
A few more "sharpness" tips are here:
http://jimdoty.com/Tips/Maximum_Sharpness/maximum_sharpness.html
I don't usually shoot on heavily overcast days (no shadows) unless there is something dramatic going on with the subject or the light (like dramatic cloud formations).
I love slightly overcast days with soft shadows for doing portraits of people and flowers.
I usually prefer to do landscapes when there is some directionality to the light (overcast or not) with distinct shadows. I prefer side light or back light. Having the sun directly behind me is my least favorite light. There are some days due to the quality of the light that a landscape can be quite magical without any directionality to the light at all.
If you look through several good photo books, or head for the mall and look at some really good calendars, ask yourself which scenes taken in overcast light appeal to you the most and why.
You can boost the contrast of an overcast scene after the fact in Photoshop with Levels and other tools.
Jim
-
Personally, I wouldn't buy Photographer's Market every year. Every two or three years is often enough.
Jim
-
Go Ellis!
I didn't care for the approach of the article. A bit too much like the lead-ins to the nightly news we've been getting lately: "This news could save your life - tune in at 11." I learned at 11 we shouldn't drink liquid drain cleaners.
My "Uncle Joe" just went digital and has a new NiCanTax SuperShot digital point-and-shoot and takes his memory cards to the local JiffyQuick lab to have his prints made. If he asked me for advice I would tell him to set his camera to sRGB and shoot jpeg. That's not the advice I would give to most people at Photo.net.
I would think photographers at Photo.net who do most of their own printing would be working in Adobe RGB or one of the other wide gamut color spaces. I could be wrong.
Jim
-
Lana,
For the purposes stated in your two posts, you won't go wrong with either camera. They work very much alike and the XTi has a few extra bells and whistles for the extra money that won't appreciably affect image quality.
However I would suggest you find a good used Canon 20D with a warranty from a reputable dealer. You can use it in dummy mode when you want to. When you want to work in manual mode, having a thumb wheel on the back to control aperture, and a dial on top to control shutter speed is very handy. Even in the auto modes, having the dial on top to adjust the preferred aperture or shutter speed, and the thumb wheel on the back to bias the exposure compensation is still very handy.
Jim
-
Help on DOF
in Nikon
Vyas,
The short version.
1) Use you longest focal length you have available (on your kit lens, that would be 70mm).
2) Use the widest aperture you can (probably f/4 or f/5.6 on the kit lens.
3) Get as close to your subject as you can.
You can read more here:
http://jimdoty.com/Tips/Depth_of_Field/dof_digital/dof_digital.html
http://jimdoty.com/Tips/Depth_of_Field/hyperfocal_digital/hyperfocal_digital.html
In the long run, you would be helped in your quest for shallow depth of field by a longer lens (200-300mm) a lens with a faster maximum aperture (f/2 or f/2.8) or both. A 50mm f/1.8 lens is one inexpensive option. A 70-300mm zoom is another option.
Jim
-
Gary,
First of all, I agree with the other posts that suggest you shoot in color and convert to B&W later.
Some suggestions for capturing "sharp" images (i.e., good edge definition and contrast) are here:
http://jimdoty.com/Tips/Maximum_Sharpness/maximum_sharpness.html
The article was written back in my film days but it all still applies to digital.
I would also suggest you shoot at your camera's highest resolution, and shoot in RAW or the highest jpeg setting.
Jim
-
Katie:
General lens choice information:
http://jimdoty.com/learn/lenses/lenses.html
Focal length info with illustrations:
http://jimdoty.com/learn/lenses/focal_length/focal_length.html
Jim
-
Alec,
It's not unusual to get some digital noise in the darkest areas of an image, even at lower ISO's with a quality camera like the the Canon 5D. It's just a fact of life in digital photography. Underexposure exaggerates the noise in the dark areas, and lightening the dark areas in Photoshop makes the noise all the more obvious. I leave the dark areas dark. As much as I love digital photography, the images don't have the wonderful "heel" and "toe" you get with a great film.
Jim
-
Tyler,
One way to change images to B&W that will give you a lot of control is to use CHANNEL MIXER in Photoshop. Directions here:
http://jimdoty.com/Digital/channel_mixer_bw/channel_mixer_bw.html
Jim
-
Adam,
A few filters you might want to consider getting:
http://jimdoty.com/Tips/Filters_Lite/filters_lite.html
Jim
-
Marc,
Keep the lens (and the girlfriend)!
Jim
-
Don't lie. Don't put yourself down. Tell her what you told us. You are happy to contribute your photojournalistic style, but she should hire a professional photographer so you can enjoy the event.
Anne and others suggested nice ways to say this.
Jim
-
The Canon EF 100mm macro and the MR-14EX ring flash work together like a dream. The flash snaps into the small ridge on the front of the lens. I've put this combo on the Canon bodies of relatively new photo graphers who have used it with few or no problems.
More here:
http://jimdoty.com/Tips/Eye_Closeup/eye_closeup.html
Jim
What is needed for those 360 real estate images?
in Accessories
Posted
Bob,
I'm going to second a few observations and add a couple of software options.
For a long time I used a Kaidan pano rig. It worked just fine and didn't cost much, but it was big and a bit awkward to use. I switched to an Arca-Swiss compatible quick release setup. I acquired the Really Right Stuff pano rig that Ellis described. I was in pano heaven.
For software I use Panorama Factory
http://www.panoramafactory.com/
or Autostitch:
http://jimdoty.com/Digital/autostitch/autostitch.html
I've used Canon 10D, 20D, and 5D bodies with wide angle lenses like the Canon EF 17-40mm and EF-S 10-22mm lenses. Any of these options work just fine.
Jim