Jump to content

bill_dewberry

Members
  • Posts

    673
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by bill_dewberry

  1. depends upon whether we're talking color or B & W film. In color,

    the differences are minute; in B & W the differences are major.

    The RZ lenses lack contrast which makes a major difference in

    prints. Zeiss lenses are smoother, more contrast, in B & W. You

    can compensate with RZ by pushing film to increase contrast,

    choice is yours. people squak about cropping the 6x6 to 8 x10,

    but its the lenses man, its the lenses. Film flatness, forget it, not

    even a discussion topic.

  2. E bay is not a win win all the time, I have had disasterous experiences buying equipment there, however good purchases can be found, it just takes time to learn which repeat sellers are honest in their equipment descriptions. I believe people don't intentionally sey out to screw people, they just over rate their equipment.
  3. At this price, there are only two lenses to consider, a planar or

    xenotar. If the price were 250, then this would be a reasonable

    choice, just not a preferred choice.

  4. "Maybe $ 1500 to spend", that thins the ranks out very quickly. Hasselbald is $ 3500 minimum for a 2 lens outfit, same with RZ; I'd suggest the 645 system either mamiya or pentax, quantum leap in results due to fim size increase, will fit your budget. Buy used from KEH, you get a two week return privilege.
  5. Depends on your budget; basic flash would be vivitar 285, mounted on some bracket, I use strobo Pro T; upgrade flash to either The Metz handle mount series, or the current favorite, quantum T 2 series with

    turbo battery. The 285 is like $ 90, the quantum $ 800, the metz somewhere in between. All in all, the 285 is quite a flash for the price.

  6. If you want to go medium format, and get the tight shots you want, you'll need extension tubes to add to the lenses. An alternative would be pentax 645 with 120 macro lens, that will focus as close as you want. Disrerding the size of the enlargement, what you will gain in MF is more detail & tonality in the print, even @ 5x7, there is a difference. The nikon 180 is everything he speaks of, but you still would not be able to focus close as you want, a 105 macro in 35mm would do that for you.
×
×
  • Create New...