PeterKrenek
PhotoNet Pro-
Posts
3,981 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Everything posted by PeterKrenek
-
-
-
-
Crystal Flower Droplets *Nature's Inspiration*
PeterKrenek commented on iLOVEnature's gallery image in Nature
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hello everyone, I have a few suggestions for the new rating system. I believe that the new rating system: 1) should be easy: four categories (Aesthetics...) to judge for the rater are too much. One category (1-7 like in the old site) or just Admire/Skip should be enough. Furthermore, it is difficult to judge Postprocessing for many people as they might not know how much PP is behind the image. 2) should be as objective - fair as possible - best anonymous (double blind) the rater should not know the identity of the rated photographer and vice versa 3) should be effective in helping to create the order of photos in the Trending Photos page, views should not matter, as they, at present, can be easily manipulated by simply pressing "Refresh" in the browser, even by the photographs authors themselves. Currently, the Trending photos are not in an ideal state, some good photograps get very few views, while some average ones get a lot of them. May be just my opinion, though. 4) it would be good to stimulate users to rate - one e.g. could earn points, may seem silly for some, but many people like games and it works on other sites and I think that this way others could see who is active and helps the site to be run. I leave this up to the admins whether some distinctions/benefits for active raters/critiquers could be created. The higher number of ratings per photo, the more objective its placement in the Trending photos. 5) there should be a kind of a "rating room" where the rater is viewing only a single image at a time, with no scrolling elements in the visual interface and being able to select a category to rate, and having the Rate 1-7 (or Admire/Skip) + Report button, and a Critique/Comment box. Nothing else. Upon rating, another image would be displayed. This is something that was there already in the previous version of PN. The rating would remain anonymous, the comment not. The list of Critiques as it is now makes it difficult to rate a higher number of photos.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
reflections Industrial reflections.
PeterKrenek commented on chris_hamilton29's gallery image in Architecture
- 14 comments
-
Long narrow canoe for a long narrow river.
PeterKrenek commented on gungajim's gallery image in Travel
-
-
-
-
- 12 comments