Jump to content

david_hay1

Members
  • Posts

    67
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by david_hay1

  1. Hi Robert,

    I used Fuji GW 690II and GSW690III. I liked the rangefinder better on the II, on the III it seemed smaller and not so high contrast, but this might be sample variation. They are nice cameras but I found that I couldn't really get enough depth of field at handholding speeds so I changed to 645.

  2. Hi Robert thanks for your suggestion.

    The film I have used this summer was dated feb 2005 and has been fine. Konica IR is very slow so lasts better than Kodak perhaps would. I am aware of the Rollei film but I haven't tried it, perhaps the time has come!

  3. I've just been on a trip to South america from London which involved four flights. I took all the film through as hand luggage including the return to London last week with no problem. Thus far the films I have developed (100, 400 and infrared) appear to be unaffected by xray. I have previously heard that transporting them in checked baggage can be a problem due to higher intensity xraying, but I have never seen any evidence of this!
  4. Thanks everyone for the useful information. Hopefully I can come back with some shots like those!

     

    Bill I will forward you an email from a friend who is travelling round South america now with some useful info.

     

    best wishes

  5. Dear all,

     

    at the end of July I will travel to South America from the UK. We plan to

    spend a few days in Buenos Aires and then travel via Uruguay to the north of

    Argentina particularly around Salta and then perhaps travel into Chile or

    Bolivia.

     

    I am open to all suggestions about which may be good photographic locations in

    this area. I'm mainly interested in black and white landscape photography and

    infrared, also architecture and street photography.

     

    Also if anyone has any general suggestions about travel in these countries

    that would be very useful.

     

    Buenos dias!

     

    David

  6. I have a Horseman 985 and I am using the modern Horseman 6x9 backs produced at the time of VHR. The older horseman backs from 980 985 etc have an additional locating lug but really this makes very little difference. I think that rangefinder cams are fully interchangeable as well, this can require adjustment of infinity stops but that is quite easy.

    I would like to upgrade to VH or VHR as well, I think the revolving back is more useful than a rangefinder on this type of camera. One item whch is really useful is the angle viewer.

×
×
  • Create New...