beau 1664876222
-
Posts
1,719 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by beau 1664876222
-
-
one more...<p><img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/4961557-lg.jpg">
-
"Beau - Medium Format?"
No, all 35mm, Leica and Nikon. Tmax 100 in Rodinal.
Ian, nice to see you.
-
-
-
-
Pentax lenses have been the deal of the century, and they were reason enough to get the *ist. I bought a dead-mint SMC A 50mm 1.7 for $30! Unfortunately (but fortunately for Pentax), now that this 10D is likely to compete well in the marketplace, the older Pentax lenses are going to get way more expensive.
-
My browser won't show the press release. Can others see it or has it been removed?
-
The press release on Steve's Digicams won't appear on my browser -- has it been removed from that site, or can others see it?
-
The Epson flatbeds will give you a useful scan, and the result will usually look slightly better than 35mm done on a dedicated film scanner or a DSLR file.
However, to get most of the benefits of medium format film, you really need a dedicated film scanner.
The prices of medium format gear dropped a lot over the last few years, but not coincidentally, the average MF kit price dropped by about as much as it costs to buy a Nikon 9000...
-
Robert, those are some very professional looking pictures, nice work.
Congratulations on getting out in the early stages of the collapse; residential real estate is about to make Nasdaq '00-'02 look like a minor hiccup.
-
Thanks Brad. As you know I'm not afraid to be behind the curve on technology ;), so maybe I'll hold out for another six months or so...
-
I'm in the same boat -- I've been getting by on a G4 while waiting for the new Intel machines.
I'm told Apple is coming out with a genuine "quad" chip fairly soon (the current machine is called "quad pro" but only because there are two "twin" chips in it). Can anyone shed light on this? I'm told the new chip will be a big step forward - is there a chance the current machine is only a stop-gap?
Can someone clarify what's expected from Adobe? Is there a Photoshop upgrade in the pipeline that is worth waiting for? I have also been holding out there, sticking with version 7.
-
It's strange to me that people who profess to be amateurs can sound so anxious about what equipment they "should" buy. Unless you're a professional trying to run a business, it doesn't matter at all. Just use what you like and don't worry!
The other thing to consider is, it's never too late (or, always too soon) to "go digital". The longer you hold out, the better and cheaper the gear will be when you make the move.
-
Frank, if you want something less grainy, I'd agree with the above poster that Acros will probably give you the best overall success rate.<p>However to my eye, nothing looks as beautiful as TMX when you really nail the exposure, it has a little magic to it.<p><img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/3895398-lg.jpg"><p>TMX in Rodinal
-
I've found that my display has way more dynamic range than I can pull out of paper and ink. (I use an Epson 2200 and ImagePrint 6.)
The thing that I can't live without is viewing the image in Photoshop through the ImagePrint profile for the paper I'm printing on. To my eye that gives a very close approximation of what the print will look like, and I do my final adjustments while viewing the image that way. It's a little like audio engineers mixing on those little NS-10 speakers rather than on the mains -- you want to be working not with the most flattering presentation of the source material but with the presentation that the end user will get.
-
So I guess this is Canadian TV circa 2005 or so? (just kidding).
Actually, I remember those days well. I lived in San Francisco in the late 80's through
1997, kind of ground zero for the internet revolution. When I met my wife, she was
working at Wired magazine. It was an exciting time.
It's amazing how much things have changed, and yet sometimes I'm nostalgic for how
things were before. For instance, I'm sure the community darkroom I used to haunt, along
with all the interesting characters that populated it, are long gone now.
-
Whenever it's going to be a good picture, I take just a couple. Whenever the picture's
going to suck, I shoot a dozen frames. I plan it exactly the opposite, but that's how it
works out.
-
There's Photo Village and a number of similar "boutique" places, but I don't know if any of those have the "Shackish" quality you desire. There still are some little mom & pop places too, particularly in the boroughs, but I am not the type that can give you the coordinates.
-
If the 24 is a "novelty length" for you, then by all means go for the CV, it's decent for the price. I wanted to like the CV, but 24 is my go-to glassware so ultimately I had to suck it up and pay the man. Luckily I found a used Elmarit real cheap.
-
Hey MVS, I couldn't resist when I saw your opener. Sorry it's an oldie though, I gotta
spend some time with the scanner and post some newer ones - my backlog of film is
getting ridiculous.
-
-
The global "sports divide" is a curious thing. On the one hand you've got countries that like their team sports rough and their athletes tough -- Aussies, Canada, Kiwis, USA, etc., and then you have the soccer countries. I've always wondered why the UK was on the soccer side; it seems so out of character. Particularly when you consider the Irish and the Scots -- what's UP with that, dudes?
-
Definitely try to use one before you buy. I borrowed a GSW III for awhile and after about 3 rolls simply couldn't stand using it anymore. The pictures looked pretty good, though.
-
It's ALL about the quality of the reels - if you have really good ones the film goes on instantly and you never screw it up.
Get the Hewes reels, the ones with the prongs for the sprocket holes instead of a clip. It takes me about 12 minutes to load 8 reels using those.
Pentax K10D vs Sony Alpha vs Nikon d80
in Mirrorless Digital Cameras
Posted