Jump to content

joe_pelizza_salusso_di_vol

Members
  • Posts

    110
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by joe_pelizza_salusso_di_vol

  1. I will use onother film, and a filter probably (but I do not use filter with any other Leica lenses).

    I have to say that I used every aperture, from 1,4 up to 16. But even inside the museum, where I was shoting, with natural (from the windows) and indoor lights, the diaphrgram 1,4 was not only very impressive, but cold too. Outside the museum the old ruins I shoted given a stunning effect: they were living and massive, with a dof never seen before.

    Joe

  2. I proved the new Summilux 1,4 asph. Well, what can I say? All the

    photos have been shoted at 3 p.m. in a iced, brilliant, clear day.

    Too much probably, The film was a normal slides Kodak press 100.

    Unluckly I cannot post any of them because I have no system for, but

    I can say you my personal impressions: The lens is crisping too much.

    And too much is my impression for everything I noticed: dof,

    clearness, separation of the colours and so on. Bokeh quite does not

    exist, every thing is in focus or very very in close up. 3D very

    good, but but... this is the point... it is a cold lens, it is very

    similar to a Zeiss lens (I have the Contax system too for this I may

    compare). It is a Leica lens, undoubtly, but, Impo, with a Zeiss

    pecularity.

    It is not a painter brush, it is a Messer, a scalpel, a double razor.

    Joe

  3. I am thinking,since one month, to buy the new 50/1,5 summilux asph.

    Is it really worth the 2,300 Euros I must disburse in order to obtain

    this gem? Or the old one is just enough? Can somebody over there help

    me? (I do not want to collect money for this my personal capriccio).

    Thank you

    Joe

  4. Please, can you help me to understand the difference between the

    three type of Visoflex?

    Can I use my normal M lenses with them?

    In a macro system, with the appropriate bellow, are they as good as

    the R macro line lenses?

    Thanks

  5. Once for all: that's not. The number they (directly from Solms) communicated me is 285xxx and this was at the end of february. But the flare free viewfinder may be just a mith related to the type of the finder. The 0.85 one will have always some problems, but not the 0,58. By, Joe.
×
×
  • Create New...