Jump to content

luther_berry

Members
  • Posts

    146
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by luther_berry

  1. Margaret,

     

    <p>

     

    Information in current lens books identify the original word(s) as

    bo-ke, a somewhat derogatory Japanese term applied to older people

    with less than perfect memory recall capabilities. Somehow the term

    has transliterated into "bokeh" and refers to out of focus areas in

    photographs. It has further been described as either "good" or "bad"

    bokeh depending on the viewer's taste.

    Prevailing opinion is that Leica lenses generally display good

    bokeh while some other manufacturer's lenses may display lesser

    quality. Good bokeh is difficult to define precisely but many

    photographers say they recognize it when they see it. A good example

    of "bad" bokeh are the donut shaped highlights in out-of-focus areas

    of images taken with mirror lenses. These donut shapes are caused by

    the hole in the back mirror thru which the image is reflected onto

    the film.

    The whole subject is very subjective and opinions range all over

    the place. Some call it "bokeh" and some call it "hokey". :-) LB

  2. "This thread raises multiple issues."

     

    <p>

     

    I think Bob is right but would suggest that perhaps the current

    thread should be split into multiple ongoing threads. Each thread

    could then concentrate on a single subject. Possible threads might

    be:

    1) Nikon vs Leica (original thread)

    2) Tonality (what is it, manifestations, examples, etc.)

    3) Bokeh (what is it, manifestations, examples, etc.)

    4) Factors affecting lens evaluations (which factors do we each

    use and why)

    5) Favorite Leica lenses

     

    It seems this thread has touched on all of these issues. LB

  3. Dan,

    My Nikon setup was almost identical to yours except I went even

    further to 400mm/f3.5 lens on the upper end. For many of the same

    reasons you mention, I replaced my F3HP's with Leica R8 plus prime

    lenses and have been extremely pleased with results. Am not

    enthusiastic about Leica zooms but the R primes are fantastic.

    IMO, the R8 is a great camera and is a pleasure to use. The

    controls are simple yet effective. For me the switch was a terrific

    success. If you already use and like the M camera/lens, I suspect

    you will also prefer the R setup to the N. Good luck. LB

  4. I think hand size is less relevant than personal feel. My hands

    are not large (medium size pistol grips fit me but large size grips

    are too big) and I like the feel/ergonomics of the R8. It is a great

    camera. Would prefer if it were lighter but it really feels solid and

    easy to use.

    Ditto to previous suggestions. Buy the R8 if you like it but keep

    the R6 as a second body. (Notice the optimist in me calls it a

    second body, NOT a backup which implies expected failure.) :-) LB

  5. Hi, Richard.

    As most of you regulars know by now, I purchased an R8 and several

    new lenses this year. Recently we were viewing some wildlife/scenic

    slides taken with my previous Nikon 400/f3.5 ED lens (a top quality

    lens). Then put on a tray of slides taken with the Leica 50/1.4 and

    90/2 using the same K64 film. I have hesitated to tell people this

    because of expected rebuttals/denials/derision, etc. BUT there was a

    discernible "difference" in the slides. It wasn't just sharpness but

    was possibly more of a tonal or contrast improvement. Whatever, my

    friend also saw it and we both commented on it. Each to his own

    purpose but I am very satisfied and happy with the results from my

    Leica lenses. LB

  6. Leica advertises their R extenders for use ONLY on lenses of f/2 or smaller. Is there a physical/optical reason why you can't use the 2X APO extender with the latest 80mm f/1.4 ROM lens? I can see why the 1.4 extender might physically not fit because of its forward bulge but don't see why the 2X wouldn't work. Thanks for info. LB
  7. Philip,

    Only in the last couple of years have I seen the term "bokeh"

    applied to describe the out-of-focus areas of a picture. But 30

    years ago, when shooting 500mm mirror telephotos, we noticed that the

    out-of-focus areas were populated with small "donut shaped"

    highlights. I never heard a specific term applied to it but that was

    apparently also bokeh. Most people disliked that particular type of

    bokeh. It didn't bother me because using mirror lenses was the only

    way I could then afford good quality long telephotos. LB

  8. Wilhelm,

    Earlier this year, I purchased a new Leica R8 and a "couple" of

    lenses. Have been VERY PLEASED with all of them. The R8 is solid

    and extremely easy to handle. The weight balances nicely with the

    lenses, especially the larger ones, 80/1.4, 100APO, 180APO, etc. The

    controls are simple yet effective and allow me to do everything I

    want (so far) with minimum fuss. The camera has caused one change in

    my photography habits. I seem to think more about the desired image

    on each shot instead of just focusing and pressing the shutter

    release. Have just completed a calibration test on my built-in spot

    meter and it checks out almost perfect for Kodachrome 64. LB

  9. Question: Can we ease up on Alfie and try getting into the spirit of Thanksgiving Day?

     

    <p>

     

    For those of you who are not familiar with this North American custom, I offer the following:

    The first Thanksgiving Day was observed in Plymouth Colony (first permanent settlement of current USA) in 1621 to celebrate their harvest and other blessings of the past year. The custom has continued and is now observed as a national holiday in our country. On the fourth Thursday of November each year we pause to celebrate our blessings, with family and friends when possible. I invite all of you to "HAVE A HAPPY THANKSGIVING" wherever you live!

    Obviously anyone who appreciates Leicas has been blessed with exceptional taste and discernment of quality. :-)) LB

  10. Tony,

    The response I got was that the "Server was too busy to respond to

    me at this time. Try again later." or something to that effect. Was

    someone using all the server CPU cycles for tech support? If this is

    the case, it would be nice to change the message to indicate that

    maintenance is being performed and approximate time the forum will re-

    open. LB

  11. Jack,

    I don't know the answer to your question but definitely empathize

    with you. Like Jay, I still rack Nikon lenses back and forth when

    installing them. Years ago this action was required to identify the

    max lens aperture for built-in meter. Actually, I even rack the

    lenses back and forth on my Leica R camera. Old habits die hard! Do

    I have to forfeit one lens or pay a penalty for such forgetfulness?

    Good luck in your search. Although the odds are probably against

    your success, you might just get lucky. Is AF really that necessary?

    I left Nikon for Leica because I didn't want to be forced into AF.

     

    <p>

     

    LB

  12. Warren,

    I use R cameras instead of M's but the question is still relevant

    so will give my "opinion". You must like the 50mm lens coverage

    since you bought the lens. If so, why not keep the 50 and add a 35

    later? Personally, I prefer 50mm over 35mm but your choice should

    depend on your likes/uses. Good luck with your decision. LB

  13. It seems to be there are two primary user types for digitals, those

    who simply want a quick snapshot of "consumer" quality and the more

    serious photographers who want a higher quality level image. The

    former are well satisfied with the current level digital cameras.

    The latter lust for still higher level capabilities in digital output.

     

    <p>

     

    Consider further the point about digital being binary. At present,

    the pixels are either ON or OFF but why must it remain so? Imagine

    an exponential improvement in design technology where the pixels

    become tiny potentiometers (is that the right term?) capable of

    accepting a charge of varying degree. Then we could get the same

    gradient tonal quality from digital that we currently get from silver

    halide films.

     

    <p>

     

    My choice for a Leica digital camera would be a new light rangefinder

    body shell available with interchangeable lens mount-board to accept

    either M lenses or R lenses. LB

  14. Michael,

    Which models are you considering? I have both 10x42 and 8x32 BA's

    and 10x32 BN binos. All are great! Can't really tell any significant

    difference in use between BA's and BN's except the BN's focus closer.

    The 32's are noticeably lighter and handier than the 42's but the

    42's have slightly better definition and early/late low light usage.

    Clarity and color rendition of all are simply amazing. One

    correction, Leica no longer recommends cleaning their binoculars

    under "running water" but recommends immersing in still water

    instead. LB

  15. I set my profile to NOT automatically receive private e-mail replies

    for postings to my questions on this forum. I have exchanged private

    e-mails with several members from this forum and have not had any

    problems with viruses. Agree with the concept of NOT opening any

    attachment on e-mail if I don't recognize the sender. May your e-

    mails be virus free and your lenses be fungus free. :-)) LB

  16. Am I missing something? Isn't the problem larger than just mail

    order processing labs? How will any camera store/film supplier

    receive film for us to buy? That film has to be shipped from the

    manufacturer to the distributor and again to the retailer. Isn't the

    film equally vulnerable during all this movement? It looks to me like

    the entire film/photographic industry is vulnerable on this issue of

    detoxing items mailed or shipped in the US. LB

  17. Alex,

    You might look at previous threads on this topic for more detail.

    Both lens types will fit on R cameras and function properly. My

    understanding is that "currently" the ROM's are used only to send

    lens information to zoom flashes when used on R8 cameras. I think

    Leica is ultimately planning to use them for focus confirmation or

    some similar purpose but they will not admit to that at this time. LB

  18. Jay,

    The other side of that coin is "Don't use a filter unless really

    necessary in rough conditions or for special effects". Maybe I am

    just lucky but in 30+ years of photography, have never damaged a

    lens. I keep the original lens cap on my SLR lens except when

    actually taking a picture. If you are using an M camera, will have

    to be careful to always remove the lens cap before taking a shot.

    LB

×
×
  • Create New...