Jump to content

andrew_kleinfeld

PhotoNet Pro
  • Posts

    53
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by andrew_kleinfeld

  1. Yep. Gives me a beautiful 6 x 6 negative. Very sharp lens. If the shutter is a bit slow

    (I assume it is because of age but don't know), no problem on color negative film,

    which is what I've used so far. Fun to use. Kodak used to compete to make the best

    cameras. I have some 620 color film in the freezer. When I shoot it, I respool it onto

    a 120 spool to send it away for color processing. I respool black and white onto the

    (rare) 620 spools to process myself. I actually use the Chevron and also a Kodak

    Medalist, as well as my modern cameras. The old ones are excellent.

  2. Look in used cameras at stores too, and at used camera dealers on the net.

     

    I would avoid pros' cameras because of wear, but these were also the hot advanced

    amateur camera in the 50's and 60's (and still would be if there were still a lot of

    advanced amateurs).

     

    I got an especially good deal on an E with the 2.8 xenotar (as sharp as the planar) but

    no meter. Terrific negatives, lightweight, convenient, sturdy, reliable.

  3. I still have not found anything as good as blotter rolls.

    Unfortunately, no one seems to make them anymore. I have a couple of

    old ones, and a couple I've bought at old camera stores getting rid of

    ancient inventory. The prints come out clean with a backward curl

    that straightens, leaving them flat with no curling at the edges.

    Nothing ever gets creased or sticks, as with a rotating drum dryer.

    Does anyone know of where they can be purchased now?

×
×
  • Create New...