Jump to content

chwn

PhotoNet Pro
  • Posts

    1,315
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by chwn

  1. Did anyone hear of Fuji Film's recall of the 120 and 220 Fujichrome Velvia 100F (RVP 100F)

    and Fujichrome Astia 100F (RAP 100F)? I understand that on an infrequent basis the film

    will incorrectly produce the color blue.

  2. I am interested to know what the difference is between the Hasselblad 350 CFE Tele-

    Superachromat and 350 FE Tele-Tessar besides 1 stop in aperature. The Tele-Tessar

    cost more even though I was always under the impression that the Superachromat

    had the highest quality. I will use the lens for landscape photography. Thanks for

    your help.

  3. Thanks for all responses. I experimented with both transparency

    and negative film in an attempt to find the most pleasing image

    when printed.

     

    The color of clothes were very accurate but skin tones were

    overly red and showed veins and blemishes more than they

    appeared in real life. I use a Hasselblad 203FE and felt like the

    images were almost too sharp. I prefer sharp images but want

    the model's skin to look more appealing.

  4. I just finished my first in-studio shoot and tried five different types

    of film. Most of my color photographs did not produce great skin

    tones or were not very flattering. Could someone suggest a

    great film to use that is available in 120?

  5. Jeff:

     

    I also considered an F5. I decided to go with the 203fe because

    I wanted the bigger negative and I liked the feel of taking pictures

    with a Hasselblad. I ended up buying a 110mm f2 and 40mm

    f2.8 lens. I also bought a 1.4 tele-converter. The downside of

    the Hasselblad system is the cost, weight of the system and lack

    of modern convenience.

     

    The 203 has a center weighted metering system. It is good but

    not nearly as sophisticated as the F5.

     

    The reason I didn't buy the 60-120 lens is that it is not as sharp

    as the 110 and is even heavier. The 110 with the 1.4

    tele-converter gives me 150mm and seems pretty sharp.

     

    For landscape work you may want to buy the 40mm and the

    180mm lens. Keep in mind that the lens size for medium format

    cameras is not the same as 35mm systems. For example the

    Zeiss 80mm is roughly equivalent to the Nikon 50mm.

     

    Definitely rent one of the 500 series with a 80mm lens for a few

    days before buying the system. The Hasselblad will be much

    more cumbersome to use than the Nikon system.

     

    Good Luck

  6. I am new to medium format photography. I just bought a 203fe

    and D-40 flash and cannot figure how to take a properly exposed

    flash picture. I have read the directions to the camera and flash

    and the Hasselblad Manual.

     

    One example of a problem was a picture in a dimly lit room with

    the f-stop at 2 and the camera set on automatic - the exposure

    time was 23 seconds. What am I doing wrong?

  7. I just bought my first MF camera. It is a 203 FE. I would like

    some advice on what lens to buy first. Hasselblad is offering

    $2,000 back on the FE 60-120 f4.8 zoom which would end up

    costing the same as a FE 80 f2.8. I have also heard great things

    about the FE 110 f2 lens, but it is twice as expensive. I take most

    pictures outdoors of children and landscape but I also plan to

    buy a flash so I can use it indoors. Any suggestions?

×
×
  • Create New...