brianchapman
-
Posts
325 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Image Comments posted by brianchapman
-
-
I like this one a lot. The water is beautiful! The fountain wasn't on when I was there :( The only thing critique wise is that it feels like the foreground is thrown off balance by the (wow, I can't think of the word at all) 'thingy' in the lower left. The colors are great too!
-
This is a crop from a larger image. I converted to B&W using ACR (PS
CS). Any comments or suggestions? Specifically, is there enough
shadow detail? It's slightly dark on my monitor here at work...
Thanks!! Brian
-
-
-
-
-
Comments? Thanks! (I really didn't know what category to put this in)
-
I know this is a couple weeks late...:) Brian
-
Thanks for the comments! The pipe was the first thing that caught my eye as I was walking around the park, so I think I want to leave it in there. Brian
-
Here's a link to a similar image...different angle.
-
This is at Gasworks Park in Seattle. I converted to b&w using the
Channel Mixer and added contrast using curves and dodging and burning
(on the building). Any comments? Thanks!!!! Brian
-
-
-
-
I think the composition is great on this one. I also like the effect of the infrared filter on the cliffside vegetation - it helps draw the eye in to the image (from the dark cliff on the right to the light vegetation in the center/left) along with the lines formed by the shore. I agree that the sky could have some more contrast but only if it didn't detract from (or blend with) the vegetation on the cliff. Brian
-
I like the reflection. It creates another set of lines leading you through the image. The only thing I would change (if it were possible) would be to take it from a slightly higher point of view to bring the bridge platform away from the top of the hills. Otherwise I love it! Brian
-
Hey Wilson, this is definately a unique shot of the bridge. I haven't seen many from this angle that worked so well. I like that the fog creates a transition in to the image instead of cutting off abruptly - it works well with the similar softness (not a bad softness) created by the motion of the water. The colors are excellent also!
Brian
-
-
Thanks again Stefano! I agree with your comments about the fence. After I posed the question I tried cropping it out and it seemed slightly 'uncomfortable' - probably becuase cropping out the fence cut out about a third of the light carousel area and it didn't balance very well. If the fence just wasn't there to begin with it might be more workable. I don't know.
Anyway, regarding your edit...I think I know what you mean, but I wouldn't be able to put it any better! The Seattle Center images Wilson has are truly amazing and when I took these I was absolutely trying to learn from some of the things he had done - and I definately have. Why not learn from the master, right? Anyway, I appreciate your input, I emailed Wilson a link so he can check them out also. I think you get another 7/7 for your comments here!!
Brian
-
Interesting observation about the background appearing to be lit by the flower - excellent point!
I had originally intended to have a black background but the image was definately more interesting and had more depth this way - your personal preference is right on!
Thanks again for the comments.
-
Stefano - thanks for the great review! I totally agree with what you said - especially about the curl and the lighting around the stem pulling your eye back down in to the image. I didn't have any more room to work with on top but I do think it would be nice to have a little more space.
Earl - at one point I had pretty much blocked out the background (it was almost black) but I think you're right about it creating a nice setting for the flower.
Thanks again!!
-
-
-
This is two images, both overexposed, "sandwiched" together in
photoshop. Comments?
Untitled
in Nature
Posted
Another goose - I like this one better, very simple. What do you think?
Brian